Budget 2026: Experts Push for Clear Tax Rules on EV, Hybrid Cars Given by Employers
Tax experts are advocating for clear perquisite taxation guidelines for electric and hybrid vehicles in Budget 2026, as current regulatory ambiguity creates uncertainty for employers and slows corporate EV adoption. Unlike conventional vehicles with established tax frameworks, EVs lack clear valuation methods due to absent engine capacity metrics and varying charging costs. Experts recommend specific provisions for charging expenses, battery costs, and hybrid vehicle components while preserving existing framework continuity.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Tax experts are urging the government to establish clear perquisite taxation rules for electric and hybrid vehicles in the upcoming Budget 2026, as employers increasingly struggle with uncertainty over how to tax EV benefits provided to employees.
Current Tax Framework Creates EV Uncertainty
For decades, employer-provided petrol and diesel cars have followed established tax guidelines with fixed monthly perquisite values based on engine capacity and limited variables. However, electric vehicles break this simplicity as they lack engine capacity for calculation anchoring, have varying charging costs between employees, and involve complex battery-related expenses that don't fit existing perquisite rules.
| Vehicle Type | Tax Calculation Basis | Clarity Level |
|---|---|---|
| Petrol/Diesel Cars | Engine size, fixed monthly value | Clear guidelines |
| Electric Vehicles | No established framework | Regulatory ambiguity |
| Hybrid Vehicles | Mixed components | Unclear distinction |
According to Deloitte, this absence of specific guidance has become a significant issue for employers who must deduct tax correctly but lack clear benchmarks, exposing them to risks from both inadequate and excessive deductions.
Impact on Corporate EV Adoption
The regulatory ambiguity is actively deterring employers from including electric and hybrid vehicles in standard corporate car policies, slowing EV adoption within organizations despite government incentives available under the Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Electric Vehicles (FAME) and allied schemes.
Puneet Gupta, Director at S&P Global, explained: "In ICE vehicles valuation are clearly defined, whereas in Electric vehicles, it is a grey area. This is because there are a lot of unknowns, resulting in difficulty in calculating the valuation. The government can jump and provide EV-specific rules, and this will reduce compliance risk, ease tax withholding decisions for employers, and avoid interpretational disputes later."
While the issue hasn't reached critical levels due to limited EV penetration in corporate fleets, increasing company adoption driven by sustainability targets and employee demand is making inconsistent tax practices more problematic.
Expert Recommendations for Budget 2026
Tax professionals are calling for the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to notify clear regulations specifically addressing electric vehicle perquisite taxation. According to Divya Baweja, Partner at Deloitte, such clarity would help employers accurately value EV perquisites while enabling employees to understand their tax liability clearly.
Key Policy Recommendations:
- Charging Expenses: Explicit allowance for reimbursement of public charging costs and home electricity consumption
- Battery Costs: Clear framework for factoring battery usage and replacement expenses
- Hybrid Vehicles: Distinct guidelines separating fuel-driven and electric components
- Framework Continuity: Focused changes rather than complete overhaul of existing car perquisite structure
Alignment with Government EV Push
Experts emphasize that the expectation for Budget 2026 is not additional incentives but regulatory clarity that aligns perquisite taxation with the government's established electric mobility initiatives. The proposed changes would close existing gaps appearing on corporate balance sheets while maintaining consistency in the current tax structure and reducing potential disputes over EV benefit valuation.















































