Rare Bitcoin bottom signal completes August 31, analyst says
Oliver Velez identifies a rare Bitcoin bottom signal completing on August 31, a pattern that has historically preceded major cycle lows. Past instances in 2015, 2018, and 2022 resulted in returns of 90% to 156% over the following year. Current market conditions, including strong ETF inflows and low exchange balances, support the bullish outlook.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
A rare technical signal indicating a potential Bitcoin bottom is set to complete on August 31, according to analyst Oliver Velez. This specific pattern has emerged only three times in the past 15 years, coinciding with major cycle lows for the cryptocurrency each time. The completion of this signal suggests that Bitcoin may be nearing a significant turning point, with historical precedents pointing to substantial upside potential over the following year.
The signal, detailed in Velez’s weekly Bitcoin Intelligence Report, operates by measuring the S&P 500 in Bitcoin rather than the traditional dollar-denominated valuation. When the chart of the S&P 500 priced in Bitcoin rises, it indicates that Bitcoin is losing ground to equities; when it falls, Bitcoin is gaining relative strength. The critical pattern consists of three consecutive rising bars on a four-month chart, with each bar closing higher than the last. This configuration has historically signaled exhaustion among sellers and a shift in market dynamics.
Historical Performance of the Signal
The reliability of this indicator is underscored by its past performance. In every instance where the pattern completed, Bitcoin was trading at or near a major cycle low. The subsequent one-year returns were consistently strong, highlighting the signal’s predictive value for long-term investors.
| Date Completed | Bitcoin Price | Distance From Cycle Low | Return 1 Year Later |
|---|---|---|---|
| January 2015 | $171 | Exact cycle low | +90% |
| December 2018 | $3,381 | Within 5.9% of cycle low | +94% |
| November 2022 | $16,197 | Exact cycle low | +156% |
Current Market Context
A fourth sequence of this pattern is currently forming. The first bar closed in December, the second in April, and the third bar is active now. Because the current bar has already surpassed the high of the previous bar, the pattern will complete regardless of further price action before the close on August 31. At present, Bitcoin’s price sits near $65,000, which would add a new entry to the historical table upon completion.
Velez outlines a clear condition that would invalidate the signal: if the next bar, covering September through December, closes green, it would indicate that Bitcoin continued to lose ground to stocks beyond the typical reversal point. This would mark the first failure of the signal in 15 years, a scenario that can be verified once the December 31 close is finalized.
Supporting Market Indicators
Beyond the technical signal, several fundamental factors support the notion of a market bottom. Bitcoin closed last week at $65,050, up 3.6%, successfully holding its 200-week moving average despite negative news flow including a hardware wallet exploit and the absence of a Clarity Act vote. Institutional interest remains robust, with ETF inflows reaching $865.3 million for the week—the strongest five-session period since June. BlackRock’s IBIT accounted for 80% of these inflows.
Exchange balances are at a seven-year low, while long-term holder supply has reached an all-time high. These metrics suggest that major institutional sellers have exhausted their supply during the recent decline, and price stability has persisted despite selling pressure. As Velez noted, the market was not rescued by buyers but rather stabilized because sellers ran out of inventory.
How might the completion of this technical signal influence institutional investment strategies for Bitcoin ETFs in Q4 2024?
What macroeconomic factors could invalidate the signal if Bitcoin continues to underperform the S&P 500 through December?
Will the current all-time high in long-term holder supply lead to increased price volatility or sustained stability as new buyers enter the market?
































