Rare Bitcoin bottom signal completes August 31, analyst says

scanx
Reviewed by
Ritika DScanX News Team
Key Highlights

Oliver Velez identifies a rare Bitcoin bottom signal completing on August 31, a pattern that has historically preceded major cycle lows. Past instances in 2015, 2018, and 2022 resulted in returns of 90% to 156% over the following year. Current market conditions, including strong ETF inflows and low exchange balances, support the bullish outlook.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
47946242

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

A rare technical signal indicating a potential Bitcoin bottom is set to complete on August 31, according to analyst Oliver Velez. This specific pattern has emerged only three times in the past 15 years, coinciding with major cycle lows for the cryptocurrency each time. The completion of this signal suggests that Bitcoin may be nearing a significant turning point, with historical precedents pointing to substantial upside potential over the following year.

The signal, detailed in Velez’s weekly Bitcoin Intelligence Report, operates by measuring the S&P 500 in Bitcoin rather than the traditional dollar-denominated valuation. When the chart of the S&P 500 priced in Bitcoin rises, it indicates that Bitcoin is losing ground to equities; when it falls, Bitcoin is gaining relative strength. The critical pattern consists of three consecutive rising bars on a four-month chart, with each bar closing higher than the last. This configuration has historically signaled exhaustion among sellers and a shift in market dynamics.

Historical Performance of the Signal

The reliability of this indicator is underscored by its past performance. In every instance where the pattern completed, Bitcoin was trading at or near a major cycle low. The subsequent one-year returns were consistently strong, highlighting the signal’s predictive value for long-term investors.

Date Completed Bitcoin Price Distance From Cycle Low Return 1 Year Later
January 2015 $171 Exact cycle low +90%
December 2018 $3,381 Within 5.9% of cycle low +94%
November 2022 $16,197 Exact cycle low +156%

Current Market Context

A fourth sequence of this pattern is currently forming. The first bar closed in December, the second in April, and the third bar is active now. Because the current bar has already surpassed the high of the previous bar, the pattern will complete regardless of further price action before the close on August 31. At present, Bitcoin’s price sits near $65,000, which would add a new entry to the historical table upon completion.

Velez outlines a clear condition that would invalidate the signal: if the next bar, covering September through December, closes green, it would indicate that Bitcoin continued to lose ground to stocks beyond the typical reversal point. This would mark the first failure of the signal in 15 years, a scenario that can be verified once the December 31 close is finalized.

Supporting Market Indicators

Beyond the technical signal, several fundamental factors support the notion of a market bottom. Bitcoin closed last week at $65,050, up 3.6%, successfully holding its 200-week moving average despite negative news flow including a hardware wallet exploit and the absence of a Clarity Act vote. Institutional interest remains robust, with ETF inflows reaching $865.3 million for the week—the strongest five-session period since June. BlackRock’s IBIT accounted for 80% of these inflows.

Exchange balances are at a seven-year low, while long-term holder supply has reached an all-time high. These metrics suggest that major institutional sellers have exhausted their supply during the recent decline, and price stability has persisted despite selling pressure. As Velez noted, the market was not rescued by buyers but rather stabilized because sellers ran out of inventory.

How might the completion of this technical signal influence institutional investment strategies for Bitcoin ETFs in Q4 2024?

What macroeconomic factors could invalidate the signal if Bitcoin continues to underperform the S&P 500 through December?

Will the current all-time high in long-term holder supply lead to increased price volatility or sustained stability as new buyers enter the market?

like18
dislike

Crypto veterans cite utility in Ethereum, Solana amid Bitcoin dominance

scanx
Reviewed by
Ritika DScanX News Team
Key Highlights

Avichal Garg and Scott Melker defend the long-term viability of Ethereum and Solana against Bitcoin-centric narratives. Garg cites Ethereum's programmability for tokenized assets and Solana's consumer utility, while Melker maintains an 80/10/10 split across Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, reflecting a shift toward utility-driven assets amidst broader retail skepticism.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
47943943

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Crypto industry veterans are challenging the narrative that only Bitcoin holds value, arguing that Ethereum (ETH) and Solana (SOL) possess compelling long-term cases driven by utility and institutional adoption. While acknowledging the dominance of Bitcoin, experts point to specific structural advantages in these altcoins that justify their inclusion in diversified portfolios.

Electric Capital co-founder Avichal Garg pushed back against the argument that "everything except Bitcoin is dead," stating that Bitcoin's success does not preclude the existence of other valuable internet-native assets. Garg identifies Ethereum, Solana, and Near Protocol as occupying distinct niches within the broader ecosystem. He views Ethereum as combining Bitcoin’s store-of-value characteristics—liquidity, divisibility, seizure resistance, and global transferability—with programmability. This combination positions Ethereum as a potential settlement layer for the global financial system, particularly as stablecoins and tokenized financial assets expand, with ETH serving as underlying collateral.

Distinct Use Cases for Altcoins

Garg differentiates the value propositions of major networks based on their technical and economic structures. While Ethereum focuses on financial infrastructure, Solana is positioned differently. Rather than competing directly with Bitcoin as "digital gold," Garg sees Solana’s high throughput, cheap transactions, stablecoin integrations, and strong developer ecosystem positioning it as a consumer-focused blockchain. Applications such as decentralized trading platforms could generate sustainable businesses on top of the network. Additionally, Garg highlighted Near Protocol as a potential beneficiary of the emerging AI-agent economy.

Portfolio Concentration and Institutional Trends

Investor Scott Melker adopts a concentrated approach, maintaining a crypto exposure of roughly 80% Bitcoin, 10% Ethereum, and 10% Solana. In an interview on Aug. 6, Melker stated that while he considers Ethereum and Solana attractive long-term investments due to growing institutional interest, he does not view them with the same permanence as Bitcoin. He argues that many crypto projects never needed tokens or failed to create tokenomics capable of transferring economic value to holders.

Despite depressing retail sentiment towards many tokens, Melker notes that spot Bitcoin ETFs, institutional adoption, stablecoins, tokenization, and blockchain integration by traditional financial institutions are expanding. The emerging divide may no longer be simply Bitcoin versus altcoins, but rather Bitcoin plus a small group of networks with demonstrable utility versus thousands of tokens with little economic reason to exist.

What the Numbers Show

The strategic allocation described by Melker highlights a bifurcation in market confidence. By allocating 20% of his portfolio to Ethereum and Solana combined, Melker signals belief in their specific utility drivers—smart contracts and high-throughput consumer applications—while retaining Bitcoin as the primary store of value. This structure suggests that while broad altcoin speculation may be waning, networks with clear economic use cases are retaining institutional and veteran investor interest.

How might the expansion of tokenized real-world assets on Ethereum impact its demand as underlying collateral for stablecoins?

What specific regulatory hurdles could hinder Solana's growth as a consumer-focused blockchain despite its high throughput and low transaction costs?

Could the emerging AI-agent economy validate Near Protocol's value proposition, or will other established networks capture this market share?

like17
dislike

More News on Bitcoin