Bitcoin, Ethereum flat as CLARITY Act vote delayed to September
Bitcoin and Ethereum traded flat on Friday as the CLARITY Act vote was delayed to September. XRP fell 2% to $1.01, while spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $128.7 million in net inflows on Thursday. Senator Cynthia Lummis vowed to continue pushing for the legislation despite the setback. Whale activity remains mixed, with large holders selling but mid-tier wallets accumulating.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin traded unchanged on Friday, while XRP dipped 2% to $1.01, as market participants reacted to the delay of the CLARITY Act vote until September. The postponement of the legislation, which aims to establish clear U.S. crypto rules, has created a period of regulatory uncertainty, though major assets remained stable. This stability comes despite significant liquidations in the derivatives market, with Coinglass data showing that 76,590 traders were liquidated for $201.31 million in the past 24 hours.
The CLARITY Act’s progress stalled due to procedural delays, prompting Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) to express frustration while vowing to continue pushing for its passage. Lummis argued the bill is essential for protecting consumers from scams and providing law enforcement with tools to target bad actors. She stated that lawmakers have "come too far to quit now" and declared that the "fight is far from over." Despite the legislative setback, experts suggest that Bitcoin and Ethereum markets are not significantly impacted by the delay, viewing it as a temporary hurdle rather than a fatal blow to the bill.
Institutional demand remains robust, with SoSoValue data revealing net inflows of $128.7 million into spot Bitcoin ETFs on Thursday. Spot Ethereum ETFs also saw positive momentum, recording net inflows of $92.2 million. These inflows contrast with the mixed signals from whale activity. According to CryptosBatman, wallets holding over 10,000 BTC have been selling for three consecutive months, while holders of 1,000–10,000 BTC remain neutral. However, smaller whale wallets holding 100–1,000 BTC have steadily accumulated, helping overall whale holdings recover to 3.06 million BTC from 2.87 million in December 2025.
| Cryptocurrency | Ticker | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin | BTC | $64,831.06 |
| Ethereum | ETH | $1,913.81 |
| Solana | SOL | $73.49 |
| XRP | XRP | $1.01 |
| Dogecoin | DOGE | $0.06972 |
| Shiba Inu | SHIB | $0.000004590 |
Market sentiment remains divided among analysts. Trader Gum noted that Bitcoin is closely repeating its previous bear-market cycle, predicting a potential mid-August grind higher followed by a prolonged decline. Gum suggested that a revisit of $57,000 could trigger a breakdown to attractive long-term accumulation levels. Conversely, other analysts argue that a bull market is emerging, citing various technical signals. President-elect Donald Trump also weighed in, stating that "crypto is a big deal" and noting that people are increasingly paying with Bitcoin.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between institutional inflows and retail liquidations highlights a structural shift in market participation. While 76,590 traders faced liquidations totaling $201.31 million, spot ETFs attracted over $220 million in combined net inflows for Bitcoin and Ethereum on Thursday alone. This suggests that institutional investors are accumulating assets during periods of volatility, while leveraged retail positions are being wiped out. Additionally, the accumulation by mid-tier whale wallets (100–1,000 BTC) alongside selling by large whales (>10,000 BTC) indicates a redistribution of holdings rather than a broad-based exit from the asset class.
How might the delay of the CLARITY Act until September impact the regulatory strategies of major crypto exchanges operating in the U.S.?
Could the continued divergence between institutional ETF inflows and retail liquidations signal a prolonged period of volatility for leveraged traders?
What are the potential market implications if President-elect Trump's pro-crypto stance influences the final passage or amendments of the CLARITY Act?

































