Abhishek Kamdar reduces Onix Solar stake to 10.82% in July
Abhishek Ashvinbhai Kamdar and his HUF reduced their stake in Onix Solar Energy Limited to 10.82% after selling 10.82 lakh shares in July 2026. The net sale involved an individual disposal of 11.02 lakh shares and an HUF acquisition of 20,150 shares. The entity is no longer classified as part of the promoter group.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Abhishek Ashvinbhai Kamdar and his Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) have reduced their combined holding in Onix Solar Energy Limited from 13.76% to 10.82%, following a net sale of 10,82,791 equity shares during July 2026. The transaction, executed through both open market and off-market routes, marks a significant shift in the promoter group’s shareholding structure as the entity exits the promoter category. The disclosure was submitted to the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) on July 25, 2026, under Regulation 29(2) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011.
The filing details a complex series of transactions where Abhishek Ashvinbhai Kamdar individually sold 11,02,941 shares, representing a 2.99% reduction in total voting capital. Concurrently, the Abhishek Ashvinbhai Kamdar HUF acquired 20,150 shares, adding 0.05% to its previously nil holding. These movements resulted in a net decrease of 2.93% in the combined stake of the acquirer and the person acting in concert (PAC). The transactions took place between July 7, 2026, and July 24, 2026.
Shareholding Structure Changes
The table below outlines the change in shareholding before and after the reported transactions:
| Category | Before Transaction | Change | After Transaction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Shares Held | 50,74,838 | (10,82,791) | 39,92,047 |
| Stake Percentage | 13.76% | (2.93%) | 10.82% |
| Kamdar Individual | 50,74,838 | (11,02,941) | 39,71,897 |
| Kamdar HUF | - | 20,150 | 20,150 |
Prior to these transactions, Abhishek Ashvinbhai Kamdar held 50,74,838 shares, while the HUF had no holdings. Post-transaction, the individual holds 39,71,897 shares (derived from 50,74,838 minus 11,02,941), and the HUF holds 20,150 shares. The combined total stands at 39,92,047 shares.
Capital Structure and Regulatory Context
Onix Solar Energy Limited’s total equity share capital remains unchanged at ₹36,86,79,260, divided into 3,68,67,926 equity shares of ₹10 each. The disclosure confirms that no shares are encumbered by pledges or liens, and there are no warrants or convertible securities affecting the diluted voting capital. The acquirer has explicitly stated that they do not belong to the promoter or promoter group post-transaction, indicating a shift in regulatory classification for future disclosures.
What the Numbers Show
The reduction in stake from 13.76% to 10.82% is notable as it keeps the holding above the 5% threshold mandated for substantial acquisition disclosures under SEBI regulations, but below the typical promoter control levels often seen in listed entities. The simultaneous acquisition by the HUF suggests a potential restructuring of holdings within the family unit, possibly for estate planning or diversification purposes, while the primary exit is driven by the individual shareholder. The use of both open market and off-market mechanisms indicates a strategy to manage liquidity impact while executing a significant volume trade.
Historical Stock Returns for Onix Solar Energy
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.40% | -3.95% | -2.96% | +32.97% | +111.91% | +8,736.40% |
How will the reclassification of Abhishek Ashvinbhai Kamdar from promoter to non-promoter impact Onix Solar Energy's corporate governance structure and decision-making dynamics?
What are the likely motivations behind the simultaneous sale by the individual and acquisition by the HUF, and does this signal broader estate planning or tax optimization strategies?
Will the reduction in promoter holding affect investor confidence and stock liquidity, given the shift in regulatory classification under SEBI regulations?


































