Nvidia in 82% of US Portfolios, Hedge Funds Overweight Seagate

scanx
Reviewed by
Ritika DScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Nvidia is held by 82% of US active fund managers, up from previous periods, but with only a 1.17x overweight to S&P 500.
  • Hedge funds heavily overweight Seagate (3.44x) and SanDisk (2.57x) compared to long-only managers.
  • Intel ranks 19th in ownership (21%) despite being the fifth-largest chipmaker by market cap.
  • Memory sector ownership expanded, with SanDisk jumping nearly nine percentage points in August.
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
50618497

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Nvidia Corp. (NASDAQ: NVDA) remains the most widely held semiconductor stock among US active fund managers, present in 82% of portfolios as of end-August 2026, according to BofA Global Research.

However, traditional long-only managers hold Nvidia at just 1.17 times its S&P 500 weighting, indicating broad but modest conviction. Meanwhile, hedge funds are concentrating bets on other AI infrastructure names, notably Seagate Technology Holdings PLC (NASDAQ: STX) and SanDisk Corp. (NASDAQ: SNDK).

Most-Owned Chip Stocks Among US Funds

BofA semiconductor analyst Vivek Arya noted that Nvidia leads ownership, followed by Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ: AVGO) at 78% and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (NASDAQ: AMD) at 51%.

Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC) stands out as an outlier. Despite having the fifth-largest market capitalization in the group, it ranks only 19th by ownership, held by just 21% of managers.

Rank Company Ownership
1 Nvidia Corp. 82%
2 Broadcom Inc. 78%
3 Advanced Micro Devices Inc. 51%
4 Micron Technology Inc. 50%
5 Applied Materials Inc. 45%
6 Lam Research Corp. 44%
7 Arista Networks Inc. 37%
7 Texas Instruments Inc. 37%
9 KLA Corp. 33%
10 Cisco Systems Inc. 31%
11 Western Digital Corp. 28%
12 Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 26%
15 SanDisk Corp. 24%
19 Intel Corp. 21%

Memory Ownership Is Still Expanding

Ownership in memory stocks expanded significantly in August. SanDisk’s ownership jumped nearly nine percentage points to 24%, the largest monthly increase among tracked stocks. Micron Technology Inc. rose approximately six percentage points to 50%, securing the fourth-most-owned spot.

Where Hedge Funds Are Betting

Hedge funds show distinct preferences compared to long-only managers. They are more overweight in Seagate, Teradyne Inc., SanDisk, Synopsys Inc., Arista Networks Inc., CIEN, LRCX, and APH.

Seagate displays the sharpest divergence. Long-only managers held it below benchmark weight (0.86x), while hedge funds held it at 3.44 times the S&P 500 weight. SanDisk also saw heavy hedge fund interest, with positions at 2.57 times benchmark weight versus 1.04 times for long-only funds.

Company Hedge Fund Weight vs. S&P 500 Long-Only Weight vs. S&P 500
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 3.44x 0.86x
Teradyne Inc. 2.73x 0.62x
SanDisk Corp. 2.57x 1.04x
Synopsys Inc. 2.51x 1.07x
Arista Networks Inc. 2.57x 1.22x

What the Numbers Show

The data reveals a bifurcation in AI investment strategies. While Nvidia enjoys universal inclusion (82%), its modest overweight ratio (1.17x) suggests it is treated as a core, baseline holding by long-only funds. In contrast, hedge funds are taking aggressive, concentrated positions in peripheral infrastructure plays like Seagate (3.44x overweight) and SanDisk (2.57x overweight), indicating a search for alpha in specific sub-segments of the AI supply chain rather than broad exposure through the dominant chipmaker.

Disclaimer: This article is AI-generated using data from ViewTrade. ScanX is not liable for any inaccuracies.

Could the significant divergence between hedge fund and long-only manager positions in Seagate and SanDisk signal an impending price correction or a sustained outperformance for these peripheral AI infrastructure plays?

How might Intel's low institutional ownership (21%) impact its ability to secure capital for its turnaround strategy compared to its higher-ranked peers like Nvidia and Broadcom?

If memory stock ownership continues to expand rapidly, will this lead to a supply-demand imbalance that could drive further margin expansion for Micron and SanDisk in the coming quarters?

like18
dislike

Chanos challenges Nvidia on AI chip rental economics

scanx
Reviewed by
Ashish TScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Jim Chanos challenged Jensen Huang's claim that Nvidia's AI chips are highly rentable, asking why the company does not lease them directly.
  • Huang cited a 22% monthly increase in rental prices for three-year-old H100 chips to $3.28 per hour as evidence of durability.
  • Chanos and Michael Burry warn that data center operators may understate depreciation risks by using six-year schedules for hardware with shorter economic lives.
  • Nvidia partnered with BlackRock, Blackstone, and Apollo to mobilize over $500 billion in financing for data centers.
  • Nvidia stock closed at $225.73, up 21.03% year-to-date and 34.12% over the last year.
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
50486101

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Short seller Jim Chanos challenged Nvidia Corp. (NASDAQ: NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang over the rental economics of artificial intelligence chips, questioning why the company does not lease its own hardware.

Huang described Nvidia’s computing hardware as a "durable and highly rentable" asset, calling it a productive, revenue-generating resource. Chanos responded by asking why Nvidia does not rent the chips directly to customers or simply continue raising prices.

The Rental Debate

The exchange occurred after Huang responded to market data showing price increases for older AI hardware. Huang stated that Nvidia compute is fungible and durable.

Chanos directly challenged this premise in a reply to Huang. "Then why not rent them out yourself? Or simply keep raising prices? $NVDA," Chanos wrote.

Huang’s comments were prompted by a post from Ornn Exchange noting that the rental price for Nvidia’s three-year-old H100 training chip had increased 22% in a month to $3.28 an hour. This increase challenges assumptions that older AI hardware necessarily loses economic value at a steady pace.

Depreciation and Accounting Risks

Chanos has previously criticized the accounting methods used by data center operators. He argued that buyers like Oracle Corp. (NYSE: ORCL) and CoreWeave Inc. (NASDAQ: CRWV) rely on unrealistic six-year depreciation schedules for their hardware.

Chanos argues that the chips can become economically obsolete within three to four years. Adjusting depreciation schedules to reflect a shorter lifespan would drastically increase annual expenses and impact reported earnings, a situation Chanos characterized as a "massive financial risk."

Hedge fund manager Michael Burry echoed these concerns. Burry estimated that major cloud providers could understate depreciation by approximately $176 billion between 2026 and 2028 by extending the useful economic lives of their computing equipment.

Residual Value and Financing Strategy

Despite skepticism from short sellers, market data indicates that older hardware currently retains value. Silicon Data estimates the residual value of six-year-old Nvidia A100 chips remains near $5,000, as customers repurpose them for lower-cost workloads.

Nvidia continues its push to establish AI computing as an investable infrastructure class. The company recently partnered with financial institutions including BlackRock, Blackstone, and Apollo Global Management to mobilize over $500 billion in financing for data centers, a strategy heavily dependent on the sustained rental economics of its hardware.

Stock Performance

At the last check, the NVDA stock was trading 0.17% higher overnight. It was up 21.03% year-to-date, advancing by 34.12% over the last year, and rose 26.94% over the last six months. It closed 2.01% higher at $225.73 per share on Friday.

Benzinga’s Edge Stock Rankings indicate that NVDA maintains a strong price trend in the long, short, and medium terms, with a solid growth score.

Disclaimer: This article is AI-generated using data from ViewTrade. ScanX is not liable for any inaccuracies.

How might the partnership with BlackRock and Apollo influence Nvidia's shift from a pure hardware vendor to an infrastructure financing model?

If regulators or auditors force data centers to shorten AI chip depreciation schedules to three years, what is the projected impact on cloud providers' earnings per share?

Could rising rental prices for older H100 chips indicate a supply bottleneck that validates Nvidia's pricing power despite short seller skepticism?

like18
dislike

More News on NVIDIA Corp