Nvidia acts as AI buyer of last resort to backstop boom, economist says
- Tyler Cowen calls Nvidia a 'buyer of last resort' for AI, arguing this support adds durability to the boom
- Nvidia partnered with six major financial firms to mobilize over $500 billion for AI infrastructure
- The company guaranteed $105 billion in lease obligations for SB Energy while investing $1.5 billion directly
- Cowen compares the sector to 1920s automobiles, noting product utility outweighs bubble concerns
- Polymarket traders see only a 12% chance of an AI bubble burst occurring this year

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Prominent economist Tyler Cowen argues that Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) is acting as a "buyer of last resort" for the artificial intelligence industry, a role he believes makes the current boom more durable rather than indicative of a bubble.
Cowen told the Prof G Markets podcast on Friday that Nvidia is investing billions across an AI sector that ultimately purchases its chips. He suggested this dynamic helps new technologies bootstrap themselves, similar to how automobiles developed in the 1920s despite many firms failing.
Nvidia Helps Finance Its Own Customers
Cowen addressed concerns that tech giants are financing an industry that subsequently spends heavily on their infrastructure. He noted that Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta can play similar roles in supporting the ecosystem.
Nvidia has expanded beyond selling GPUs to actively facilitating capital for its customers. On Aug. 10, the company partnered with Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs, and KKR to establish financing platforms. These platforms aim to mobilize more than $500 billion of third-party capital for AI compute infrastructure.
| Partner | Role | Capital Target |
|---|---|---|
| Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Brookfield, Goldman Sachs, KKR | Financing platform partners | >$500 billion |
| SB Energy | Data-center campus partner | $105 billion guarantee |
A week later, Nvidia agreed to guarantee up to $105 billion of OpenAI-linked lease obligations at SB Energy’s Ohio data-center campus. The company also agreed to invest $1.5 billion in SB Energy and serve as the exclusive AI compute provider for the site, according to Reuters.
Bubble Debate Misses the Point
Cowen dismissed the debate over whether AI constitutes a bubble as the "wrong discussion." He argued investors should instead ask if the product works, stating the answer is a "very clear yes."
He compared the current landscape to the early automobile industry, where many companies failed without rendering the underlying technology worthless. While he acknowledged that debt-financed data centers could create "bad macro consequences" such as capital losses or solvency problems if the boom reverses, he stated the fallout would likely fall well short of the 2008 financial crisis.
Polymarket traders assign a 12% chance of the AI bubble bursting this year, suggesting limited near-term collapse risk among betting markets.
What the Numbers Show
The scale of Nvidia’s financial commitments highlights a shift from pure hardware sales to infrastructure financing. The $105 billion lease guarantee for SB Energy dwarfs its direct $1.5 billion equity investment in the same project, indicating a strategy where credit enhancement drives adoption more than direct capital injection.
How might Nvidia's shift from pure hardware sales to infrastructure financing alter its risk profile and revenue stability in a potential AI downturn?
What are the systemic risks to global financial markets if the $500 billion in mobilized third-party capital for AI compute fails to generate expected returns?
Could Nvidia's role as a 'buyer of last resort' create antitrust concerns or regulatory scrutiny regarding its dominance over the AI ecosystem's funding?

































