Shriram Finance receives ₹7.5 crore GST penalty orders for FY21-23
- Shriram Finance received penalty orders totaling approx ₹7.5 crore for FY21 to FY23
- Penalties relate to non-payment of RCM tax and ineligible ITC on auto dealer invoices
- Orders issued by Additional Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex, Navi Mumbai
- Company states no material impact on financials; awaiting tax consultant opinion
- Penalty amount equals tax demand exactly for each year and category
*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Shriram Finance has received penalty orders totaling approximately ₹7.5 crore from the Additional Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex, Navi Mumbai, for fiscal years 2020-21 through 2022-23.
The penalties were levied under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, read with corresponding provisions of the MGST Act, 2017, and Section 20 of the IGST Act, 2017. These orders pertain to show cause cum demand notices against the erstwhile Shriram City Union Finance Limited, which amalgamated with the company effective April 1, 2022.
Nature of Violations
The demand arises from two primary categories of tax discrepancies identified by the authority:
- Non-payment of tax under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on services rendered by service providers.
- Ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed on invoices issued by automobile and motor vehicle dealers.
The company stated that there is no material impact on its financial, operational, or other activities. However, out of commercial prudence, it awaits an opinion from its tax consultant regarding the Maharashtra state demand orders received on September 22, 2026.
Penalty Breakdown by Fiscal Year
The following table details the tax demand and penalty levied for each fiscal year across the two violation categories:
| Fiscal Year | Category | Tax Demand (₹) | Penalty Levied (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY21 | Non-payment of RCM tax | 46,81,440 | 46,81,440 |
| FY21 | Ineligible ITC (Auto dealers) | 13,50,434 | 13,50,434 |
| FY22 | Non-payment of RCM tax | 93,64,842 | 93,64,842 |
| FY22 | Ineligible ITC (Auto dealers) | 90,26,090 | 90,26,090 |
| FY23 | Non-payment of RCM tax | 1,75,32,162 | 1,75,32,162 |
| FY23 | Ineligible ITC (Auto dealers) | 1,39,41,580 | 1,39,41,580 |
What the Numbers Show
A distinct pattern emerges when analyzing the penalty structure across the three fiscal years: the penalty amount levied is exactly equal to the tax demand amount in every instance. This suggests that the authority imposed a 100% penalty on the disputed tax amounts rather than a graduated fine. Furthermore, the total exposure shows a significant upward trajectory, with the combined demand and penalty for FY23 (₹3.14 crore) being more than double that of FY21 (₹1.21 crore), indicating that the volume or value of transactions subject to these specific GST compliance issues increased substantially over the period prior to the amalgamation.
Historical Stock Returns for Shriram Finance
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +0.48% | +3.16% | -10.55% | +7.69% | +60.99% | +275.34% |
How might the pending tax consultant opinion influence Shriram Finance's decision to appeal the penalty orders in higher courts?
Will the rising trend in GST discrepancies across FY21-FY23 trigger a broader regulatory audit of the post-amalgamation entity's internal controls?
Could this precedent of 100% penalties on RCM and ITC issues impact investor sentiment regarding compliance risks in other NBFCs undergoing mergers?
20
Access Market Heat-map & Insights 
Create, Save & Share your Screener 
Use 200+ Screening Filters 
