United Textiles seeks reclassification of 18 promoter group members
- United Textiles Ltd received reclassification requests from 18 promoter group members on October 17, 2026
- Board meeting scheduled for November 13, 2026, to approve movement from Promoter Group to Public category
- 12 of the 18 applicants currently hold zero equity shares in the company
- Combined shareholding of all applicants stands at 23,200 shares, led by Amit Kumar Aggarwal's 17,200 shares

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
United Textiles Limited received applications from 18 members of its Promoter Group seeking reclassification from the "Promoter/Promoter Group" category to the "Public" category. The company filed this intimation with BSE on October 17, 2026, pursuant to Regulation 30 and Regulation 31A of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
The Board of Directors is scheduled to consider these requests at a meeting on Friday, November 13, 2026. If approved, the company will undertake necessary steps in compliance with Regulation 31A to update its shareholding pattern records.
Applicants and shareholding details
The applicants include individuals and Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) associated with the Aggarwal family. Notably, a significant portion of the applicants hold zero equity shares or negligible amounts, indicating they may not have active economic stakes despite their historical classification as promoter group members.
| Sr. No. | Name of Applicant | Shares Held | Shareholding (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A.K. Agarwal (HUF) | 0 | 0.00% |
| 2 | Amit Kumar Aggarwal | 17,200 | 0.57% |
| 3 | Anand Kumar Agarwal | 100 | 0.00% |
| 4 | Arun Kumar Aggarwal | 100 | 0.00% |
| 5 | Ashok Kumar Agarwal | 5,700 | 0.19% |
| 6 | Brij Bala | 0 | 0.00% |
| 7 | Pushpa Agarwal | 0 | 0.00% |
| 8 | Shalini Aggarwal | 100 | 0.00% |
| 9 | Shiv Kumar Agarwal | 100 | 0.00% |
| 10 | Sumit Agarwal | 0 | 0.00% |
| 11 | Sushila Agarwal | 0 | 0.00% |
| 12 | Vikas Kumar Aggarwal | 0 | 0.00% |
| 13 | Vinod Kumar Agarwal | 0 | 0.00% |
| 14 | Vinod Kumar Agarwal HUF | 0 | 0.00% |
| 15 | Naresh Kumar Aggarwal | 0 | 0.00% |
| 16 | Maina Rani | 0 | 0.00% |
| 17 | Flora Bell Dkhar | 0 | 0.00% |
| 18 | Sayeedullan Nongrum | 0 | 0.00% |
Compliance certifications
Each applicant submitted declarations confirming compliance with Regulation 31A(3) conditions. Key certifications include:
- Holding no more than 10% of total voting rights individually or with related persons.
- No direct or indirect control over company affairs or policy decisions.
- No representation on the Board of Directors or key managerial positions.
- No pending regulatory actions or status as wilful defaulters.
- Agreement to maintain public category status for at least three years post-reclassification.
Deceased promoters and record updates
The filing also disclosed two deceased individuals currently listed in the promoter group records:
| Name | Shares Held | Date of Death | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Late Ms. Pushpa Agarwal | Nil | July 12, 2023 | Deceased |
| Late Mr. Shiv Kumar Agarwal | 100 | April 4, 2010 | Deceased |
For Late Mr. Shiv Kumar Agarwal, who held 100 shares, the company is coordinating with its Registrar and Share Transfer Agent to complete formalities for updating records. Late Ms. Pushpa Agarwal held no shares.
What the numbers show
A review of the applicant list reveals that 12 out of 18 applicants hold zero equity shares, representing 0.00% of voting rights. Only two applicants hold more than 100 shares: Amit Kumar Aggarwal (17,200 shares, 0.57%) and Ashok Kumar Agarwal (5,700 shares, 0.19%). The combined shareholding of all 18 applicants is 23,200 shares. This concentration suggests that the majority of those seeking reclassification are nominal holders or family members with no current economic stake, aligning with SEBI's intent to clean up promoter group definitions where control or significant holding does not exist.
How might the reclassification of 18 promoter group members impact United Textiles Limited's future eligibility for preferential allotments or rights issues?
Will the reduced promoter group size affect the company's compliance with minimum public shareholding norms under SEBI regulations?
Could the removal of nominal promoter group members influence institutional investor sentiment regarding the company's corporate governance structure?

































