Mphasis awarded EcoVadis Silver Medal with 75 score in FY26
Mphasis Limited secured a Silver Medal from EcoVadis for FY26 with an overall score of 75/100 and an 87th percentile ranking. The company scored highest in Environment (82) and lowest in Sustainable Procurement (67). The disclosure was filed under SEBI Regulation 30 on July 31, 2026.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Mphasis has been awarded a Silver Medal by EcoVadis for its sustainability performance in FY26, achieving an overall score of 75 out of 100. The assessment places the company in the 87th percentile globally, reflecting its standing relative to other evaluated firms. The results were disclosed on July 31, 2026, via filings to the BSE and NSE.
The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Mayank Verma, Senior Vice President and Company Secretary, signed the intimation letter addressed to the listing exchanges. The detailed scorecard is available on the company’s website.
Sustainability Scorecard Breakdown
EcoVadis evaluates companies across four key impact categories: Environment, Labor & Human Rights, Ethics, and Sustainable Procurement. Mphasis demonstrated varying levels of impact across these domains, with Labor & Human Rights carrying the highest weightage in the overall scoring model.
| Category | Score | Impact Level |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 75 / 100 | 87th Percentile |
| Environment | 82 / 100 | Moderate |
| Labor & Human Rights | 76 / 100 | High |
| Ethics | 73 / 100 | Moderate |
| Sustainable Procurement | 67 / 100 | Moderate |
The Environment category recorded the highest individual score at 82, while Sustainable Procurement scored 67. Labor & Human Rights was identified as having the highest impact on the final score, indicated by four filled indicators in the assessment framework.
What the Numbers Show
The disparity between the highest category score (Environment, 82) and the lowest (Sustainable Procurement, 67) suggests a divergence in maturity across sustainability pillars. While operational environmental controls appear robust, supply chain integration remains a lower-priority or developing area compared to internal labor and ethical standards. The high weighting of Labor & Human Rights implies that improvements in this domain would yield the most significant uplift in future ratings.
Historical Stock Returns for Mphasis
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.19% | +4.92% | +8.36% | -15.10% | -16.54% | -9.90% |
How might Mphasis's relatively lower score in Sustainable Procurement impact its ability to win contracts with multinational clients enforcing strict supply chain ESG mandates?
What specific strategic initiatives is Mphasis planning to implement to address the gap between its high Environmental score and its moderate Sustainable Procurement rating?
Given that Labor & Human Rights carries the highest weightage, how could targeted improvements in this area accelerate Mphasis's progression from a Silver to a Gold EcoVadis medal in the next assessment cycle?


































