Mphasis fined ₹35,400 for SEBI board composition breach
Mphasis Limited faces a ₹35,400 penalty from BSE and NSE for failing to maintain proper board composition under SEBI Regulation 17(1) in Q4FY26. The fine covers a six-day period in January 2026. The company has filed a waiver request and argued that governance was not impaired during the transition. This follows a similar notice for Q3FY26, highlighting recurring compliance challenges during leadership changes.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Mphasis Limited ( company name ) has been levied a fine of ₹35,400 by the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) for alleged non-compliance with Regulation 17(1) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The penalty addresses a governance gap during the quarter ended March 31, 2026, specifically covering the period from January 1, 2026, to January 6, 2026, when the company did not have a regular Non-Executive Chairperson appointed. This regulatory action highlights ongoing scrutiny over board composition compliance among listed IT services firms.
The fines were imposed under the Standard Operating Procedure for penal actions prescribed in SEBI Master Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026, issued on July 11, 2023, and last updated on January 30, 2026. The notice, dated May 27, 2026, cited a violation rate of ₹5,000 per day for six days of non-compliance, resulting in a basic fine of ₹30,000. With an added Goods and Services Tax (GST) of 18% amounting to ₹5,400, the total payable stands at ₹35,400. The exchanges warned that failure to pay within 15 days could lead to freezing of promoter shareholdings or suspension of trading if consecutive defaults occur under Regulations 17(1), 18(1), or 27(2).
Regulatory Timeline and Waiver Status
This is not an isolated incident for Mphasis. The company previously received similar notices on February 27, 2026, regarding non-compliance for the quarter ended December 31, 2025, covering the period from December 11, 2025, to December 31, 2025. In response to both instances, Mphasis submitted a consolidated waiver application to the stock exchanges on March 13, 2026. The application sought consideration for waiving the fines for both the December 2025 and January 2026 periods. As of the latest filing, the outcome of this waiver request remains awaited.
The Board of Directors reviewed the matter at its meeting held on July 23, 2026. Prior to this, the initial notices were placed before the Board on March 27, 2026, with comments filed with the exchanges on March 28, 2026. The company emphasized that the appointment of a Chairperson required careful deliberation due to the role's significance. During the interim period, no Board meetings were convened, which the company argues prevented any impairment of governance operations.
Board Defense and Compliance Stance
In its submission, the Board reiterated that the temporary transition in leadership did not necessitate the immediate induction of additional Independent Directors. The company maintains that it remained compliant with the broader intent of Regulation 17 of the SEBI Listing Regulations. Mayank Verma, Senior Vice President and Company Secretary, signed the disclosure, noting that the information is available on the company’s website. The regulatory framework requires such non-compliance matters to be placed before the Board, with subsequent comments disseminated to the exchanges via the NEAPS portal.
| Regulation Violated | Period of Non-Compliance | Fine Rate | Days/Instances | Basic Fine (₹) | GST @18% (₹) | Total Fine (₹) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reg 17(1) | Jan 1, 2026 – Jan 6, 2026 | ₹5,000/day | 6 days | 30,000 | 5,400 | 35,400 |
What the Numbers Show
The financial impact of the fine is negligible relative to Mphasis’s operational scale, but the reputational and procedural implications are material. The pattern of consecutive quarters with board composition gaps—December 2025 and January 2026—suggests a structural transition issue rather than an isolated administrative error. The company’s strategy relies on securing waivers rather than contesting the technical breach, indicating acceptance of the regulatory finding while arguing for leniency based on the lack of operational disruption. Investors should monitor whether the waiver is granted, as repeated defaults could trigger stricter enforcement actions, including trading suspensions, under the SEBI Master Circular.
Historical Stock Returns for Mphasis
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.25% | -6.27% | -1.78% | -19.91% | -19.43% | -12.87% |
How might the pending waiver decision influence investor sentiment regarding Mphasis's corporate governance stability?
Could this pattern of board composition gaps signal broader leadership transition challenges within the Indian IT services sector?
What specific operational safeguards should Mphasis implement to prevent future regulatory penalties under SEBI Listing Regulations?


































