Manoj Ceramic has closed its trading window for dealing in equity shares effective October 1, 2026. This closure is in preparation for the Board of Directors' meeting to consider and declare the unaudited financial results for the half year ending September 30, 2026.

Regulatory Compliance and Timeline

The company stated that the trading window is closed for all Directors, Designated Persons, and connected persons. This action is taken pursuant to the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015, as amended, and the Company's Policy for Prohibition of Insider Trading.

The trading window will reopen at the expiry of forty-eight hours after the declaration of the unaudited financial results for the half year ending on September 30, 2026. The specific date of the Board Meeting for this consideration will be intimated in due course.

Key Details

This procedural step ensures compliance with insider trading norms during the sensitive period preceding the release of financial performance data for the first half of the fiscal year.

Manoj Ceramic Limited held its 20th Annual General Meeting (AGM) on September 22, 2026, where shareholders unanimously approved all six proposed resolutions. The meeting, conducted via Video Conferencing, saw no votes cast against any agenda item.

The company’s Board of Directors adopted the audited standalone and consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended March 31, 2026. Additionally, the meeting approved the re-appointment of Dhruv Rakhasiya as a Director and ratified the remuneration payments for Executive Directors Manoj Dharamshi Rakhasiya and Aakash Manoj Rakhasiya, as well as Non-Executive Director Anjana Manoj Rakhasiya.

Voting outcomes and participation

The Consolidated Scrutinizer’s Report, issued by KDA & Associates, confirmed that all resolutions were passed with 100% of the polled votes in favour. A total of 7,394,200 shares were voted on for the ordinary resolutions regarding financial statements, representing 53.55% of the total outstanding shares of 13,807,000. For the special resolutions concerning director remuneration, the number of votes polled varied slightly due to invalid votes or abstentions in specific categories, but the final tally remained unanimous among valid votes.

Promoter influence on voting patterns

A clear pattern emerges when analyzing the voting behavior across different shareholder categories. The Promoter and Promoter Group, holding 7,372,800 shares, voted consistently across all resolutions. However, their participation rate varied significantly depending on the resolution type. For the adoption of financial statements, promoters voted 100% of their holdings. In contrast, for the re-appointment of Dhruv Rakhasiya, promoter votes polled dropped to 6,194,200, with 1,178,600 votes recorded as invalid or abstained. This trend continued for remuneration approvals, where promoter votes polled ranged from 4,404,800 to 6,470,800, indicating selective participation or procedural exclusions for interested parties in specific special resolutions.

Public institutional holders did not cast any votes across all six resolutions, despite holding 489,000 shares. Public non-institutional holders showed minimal engagement, casting only 21,400 votes for every resolution, which constituted less than 0.4% of their total holding of 5,945,200 shares. This suggests that the outcome of the AGM was predominantly determined by the promoter group’s voting decisions.