Gary Black cites gas prices over FSD for Tesla Q3 sales surge
- Tesla delivered 486,532 units in Q3FY26, beating consensus estimates but falling 2% YoY
- Gary Black attributes sales growth to a 50% increase in gas prices rather than FSD adoption
- Waymo operates 4,000+ driverless vehicles in 15 metros compared to Tesla’s 589 in Texas
- Tesla adjusted Austin Robotaxi hours to address nighttime visibility issues with camera-only FSD

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Tesla Inc. delivered 486,532 units in Q3FY26, a figure investor Gary Black attributes primarily to a 50% rise in gasoline prices since February rather than widespread Full Self-Driving (FSD) adoption.
Black noted that while deliveries exceeded the consensus estimate of 462,000, they remained down 2% year-on-year from the record 497,099 units sold in Q3FY25. The prior year’s peak was fueled by the expiration of the $7,500 Federal EV Credit on September 30, 2025. Black argued that only 35% of Tesla’s sales originate from the US, and unsupervised FSD is approved in a single-digit percentage of the country, limiting its direct impact on global volume.
Competitive Landscape: Tesla vs Waymo
Black highlighted a significant disparity in autonomous driving scale between Tesla and Alphabet’s Waymo. While Tesla has secured approval for unsupervised driving in six metropolitan cities, Waymo operates in 15 US metros.
| Metric | Tesla | Waymo |
|---|---|---|
| Approved Metros | 6 | 15 |
| Driverless Vehicles | 589 (Texas) | 4,000+ (Nationwide) |
The investor emphasized that Tesla’s FSD scale-up has fallen short of management guidance, with investors now focused on efforts to expand autonomy against competitors. Rivian Automotive also reported strong Q3 results, beating expectations while maintaining its FY26 guidance of 65,000-70,000 units.
Robotaxi Operational Challenges
Tesla recently adjusted its Austin Robotaxi service cutoff from 10:00 pm to 11:00 pm to address nighttime visibility issues. Elon Musk stated the company is working to improve FSD performance in poor lighting conditions, specifically noting challenges in detecting pets on roads at night. Unlike Waymo, which utilizes LiDAR alongside cameras, Tesla’s FSD relies exclusively on camera-based vision systems.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between Tesla’s delivery beat and its autonomous scaling metrics suggests that current demand is driven by macroeconomic factors like fuel costs rather than technological superiority in autonomy. With Waymo operating nearly seven times more driverless vehicles across more than double the number of cities, Tesla’s competitive edge in the robotaxi sector appears constrained by regulatory approvals and operational scale despite its larger overall vehicle footprint.
How might Tesla's reliance on camera-only vision systems impact its ability to secure regulatory approvals in new metropolitan areas compared to LiDAR-equipped competitors like Waymo?
If gasoline prices stabilize or decline, what specific technological milestones must Tesla achieve to sustain delivery growth independent of macroeconomic fuel cost factors?
What strategic adjustments might Tesla make to its Robotaxi operational hours and safety protocols to address nighttime visibility challenges without compromising service competitiveness?

































