Eureka Forbes GST liability cut to ₹4.50 crore by UP authorities
- UP GST authorities reduced Eureka Forbes' FY23 liability from ₹273.40 crore to ₹4.50 crore
- Rectification order issued under Section 161 of UP GST Act on October 1, 2026
- Revised tax liability stands at ₹3.19 crore with ₹0.99 crore interest and ₹0.32 crore penalty
- Company maintains the revised demand is devoid of merits and intends to contest it

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Eureka Forbes has received a rectification order from Uttar Pradesh GST authorities reducing its alleged tax liability for FY23 from ₹273.40 crore to ₹4.50 crore. This significant reduction follows the company's initial show cause notice received in September 2026.
The rectification order was issued under Section 161 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-1, Lucknow. It revises the earlier notice dated September 25, 2026, which had been disclosed on September 28, 2026. The new order was received on October 1, 2026.
Revised Liability Breakdown
The regulatory filing details the specific components of the disputed amount after rectification. The authority has significantly lowered the base tax, interest, and penalty claims compared to the original notice.
| Component | Original Claim (₹ crore) | Revised Claim (₹ crore) |
|---|---|---|
| Tax liability | 149.21 | 3.19 |
| Interest | 109.27 | 0.99 |
| Penalty | 14.92 | 0.32 |
| Total | 273.40 | 4.50 |
Company's Continued Legal Stance
Despite the reduction, Eureka Forbes stated that the proposed demand in the rectified notice still appears to have been computed using pan-India level financial information from its signed financials for FY23. The company argued that this approach failed to establish corresponding transaction-level liability attributable specifically to its Uttar Pradesh GST registration.
The management maintains that the rectified notice is also not sustainable in law or procedure. Consequently, the company plans to contest the matter comprehensively within prescribed timelines. Eureka Forbes does not envisage any material impact on its financials, operations, or other activities arising from this development.
What the Numbers Show
The rectification order drastically alters the scale of the dispute. The total alleged liability has fallen by approximately 98%, dropping from ₹273.40 crore to ₹4.50 crore. In the original notice, interest and penalties constituted nearly 45% of the total claim. In the revised order, these non-tax components account for roughly 29% of the total (₹1.31 crore out of ₹4.50 crore), indicating a shift where the principal tax assessment remains the dominant factor in the reduced claim.
Historical Stock Returns for Eureka Forbes
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -4.53% | -2.18% | -15.87% | -33.02% | -38.95% | -34.47% |
How might the successful reduction of tax liability under Section 161 influence Eureka Forbes' approach to pending GST disputes in other states?
What specific procedural arguments will Eureka Forbes prioritize when contesting the remaining ₹4.50 crore demand to establish transaction-level liability?
Could this rectification precedent encourage other consumer durable companies to challenge pan-India financial data-based assessments in state-level GST audits?


































