Bombay Burmah Trading Asks Supreme Court to Overturn ₹4,655 Crs Lease Rent Views on Singampatti Tea Estate
Bombay Burmah Trading has approached the Supreme Court to recall lease rent observations worth ₹4,655 crs related to its Singampatti Tea Estate, arguing the CEC report relies on an unapproved internal calculation. The Corporation has completed land handover of 8,373.57 acres to the State Forest Department and settled VRS for 534 workers, while contesting that no formal notice was issued for the disputed amount as mandated by the Madras High Court.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Bombay Burmah Trading has filed a detailed Interlocutory Application before the Supreme Court seeking to recall and expunge observations pertaining to lease rent contained in the Court's order dated May 29, 2026. The application follows the Court's reliance on a report by the Central Empowered Committee (CEC), which recorded that certain lease rentals remain to be recovered by the State Government. The Corporation argues that the CEC report relies on an unapproved internal calculation of ₹4,655 crs by a department lacking jurisdiction, and it has received no formal demand or communication from the Government regarding this amount.
Background: Singampatti Tea Estate and Cessation of Operations
The judicial proceedings concern the Corporation's tea estate in Singampatti, Tamil Nadu, held under a 99-year lease dated February 12, 1929. In December 2023, the Corporation determined that continuing the leasehold rights was unviable and ceased all plantation and factory operations effective June 16, 2024. Consequently, a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) was introduced for 534 workers, with dues paid or deposited with the Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Plantation) for disbursement.
Workmen challenged the cessation of operations through Writ Petitions before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, which were dismissed on December 3, 2024. Following this, the Corporation began handing over land to the State Forest Department. On May 8, 2025, it handed over 8,152.13 acres of the total 8,373.57 acres, temporarily retaining 221.44 acres containing bungalows and factory buildings to remove movables.
Land Handover and Supreme Court Proceedings
The Supreme Court order acknowledged the substantial progress made in handing over possession and the completion of VRS settlements. The Corporation subsequently demobilised all movables, dismantled machinery, and demolished factory buildings on the retained land. It handed over possession of this final 221.44 acres to the Forest Department on an "as is where is basis" on July 11, 2026.
Lease Rent Dispute
The dispute over lease rent is distinct from the land handover proceedings. The Supreme Court order directs the State to follow the orders of the Madras High Court, which had previously quashed demands of ₹231.9 crs and remanded the matter for re-quantification. The High Court had mandated that notice be issued to the Corporation by September 8, 2025, and proceedings concluded by October 15, 2025, after hearing the appellant. The Corporation asserts that no such notice or opportunity for hearing has been provided regarding the ₹4,655 crs figure.
The following table summarises the key dates, figures, and details central to the Singampatti tea estate proceedings:
| Key Dates and Details | Description |
|---|---|
| Lease Date | February 12, 1929 |
| Operations Ceased | June 16, 2024 |
| VRS Workers | 534 |
| Initial Land Handover | May 8, 2025 (8,152.13 acres) |
| Final Land Handover | July 11, 2026 (221.44 acres) |
| Total Land Area | 8,373.57 acres |
| Quashed Demand | ₹231.9 crs |
| Disputed CEC Calculation | ₹4,655 crs |
Historical Stock Returns for Bombay Burmah Trading
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.83% | -2.01% | -7.75% | -15.92% | -26.44% | +14.49% |
How will the Supreme Court's ruling on the Interlocutory Application impact the precedent for calculating lease arrears on historical government leases?
What are the potential financial liabilities or provisions Bombay Burmah Trading must recognize if the ₹4,655 crore demand is upheld?
Could the protracted legal dispute over lease rent affect the company's ability to repurpose the capital tied up in the Singampatti estate?


































