Sanders warns of Big Tech AI oligarchy, pushes for superintelligence ban
- Sen. Bernie Sanders warns of Big Tech oligarchy controlling AI without public input
- Sanders backs Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act to prohibit superintelligent AI
- Proposal includes temporary pause on advanced AI until federal safety standards set
- Sanders pushes for national data-center moratorium and public ownership stakes in AI labs
- Industry leaders like Bill Ackman and Jensen Huang urge caution or focus on pragmatic risks

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) escalated his push for stricter artificial intelligence regulation on Monday, warning that a small group of Big Tech billionaires should not determine the technology's societal impact without public oversight.
Sanders Warns of AI ‘Oligarchy’
"The most pressing issue of our time is oligarchy & the power of Big Tech billionaires over AI," Sanders wrote on X. He added, "We can’t allow a handful of greedy people to play God & determine the future of humanity—our economy, environment, democracy, privacy & more—without public input."
He concluded with a call to action: "CONGRESS MUST ACT."
The comments came days after Sanders and Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) announced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act, one of Congress' most aggressive AI proposals yet.
Sanders Wants Superintelligence Banned
The legislation would permanently prohibit the development and deployment of superintelligent AI while temporarily pausing advanced AI development until a federal regulator establishes safety standards.
It also calls for international agreements to prevent superintelligence from being developed globally. The proposal has drawn criticism from investors and technology policy advocates.
Pershing Square founder Bill Ackman argued that halting U.S. development could allow geopolitical rivals to reach superintelligence first.
Sanders’ AI Push Expands to Data Centers, Public Ownership
Sanders has pushed for a national data-center moratorium, later working with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) to put the idea into legislation. While initially facing resistance from Democrats, similar calls have since gained bipartisan support.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has halted new data-center approvals pending reviews of their water and power needs. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) now requires local approval for new projects.
In June, Sanders proposed giving the public ownership stakes in major AI labs, with the government having a say in deployment decisions. The idea echoes proposals from Anthropic and OpenAI.
Last week, Nvidia Corp (NASDAQ: NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang urged regulators to focus on real-world risks, saying, "Don’t regulate hypothetical theoretical harm, regulate actual and pragmatic harm."
Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ: MSFT) co-founder Bill Gates said he would support a credible global plan to slow AI advances, though he acknowledged such a plan is unlikely.
How might the proposed Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act impact U.S. competitiveness against geopolitical rivals like China if enacted?
What are the potential economic consequences for the tech sector if a national data-center moratorium gains broader bipartisan support?
Could the concept of public ownership stakes in AI labs gain traction among moderate Democrats, or will it remain a fringe proposal?





























