Sanders says Trump lied on 10% rate cap as banks profit

scanx
Reviewed by
Radhika SScanX News Team
Key Highlights

Sen. Bernie Sanders accused President Donald Trump of failing to deliver on a promise to cap credit card interest rates at 10%, pointing to $49 billion in quarterly profits by major banks charging 25-30% interest. Sanders called for legislative action against usury as Americans carry $1.25 trillion in credit card debt. Despite the high rates, major banks like JPMorgan Chase & Co and Goldman Sachs reported strong Q2 earnings, beating analyst expectations on robust consumer spending.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
45723417

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt) stated on Wednesday that President Donald Trump lied about his promise to cap credit card interest rates at 10% while major banks continued to earn significant profits from consumer lending. In a post on X, Sanders highlighted that major banks generated $49 billion in profit during the last quarter, charging interest rates between 25% and 30% even as working Americans struggled to pay their bills. He urged Congress to confront the greed and usury of Wall Street, arguing that banks are profiting from consumers facing high borrowing costs.

Unfulfilled Rate Cap Proposal

Sanders referred to a proposal Trump announced in January to temporarily cap credit card interest rates at 10% for one year, starting on the first anniversary of his second inauguration. The proposal was intended to address consumer affordability, criticizing credit card companies for rates between 20% and 30%. However, no nationwide cap has been implemented to date.

Federal Reserve data indicated that the average interest rate on credit card accounts assessed interest stood at 22.15% in May, more than double the 10% cap Trump proposed. Americans owed approximately $1.25 trillion in credit card debt as of the first quarter of 2026, a slight decrease from the record $1.28 trillion at the end of 2025 but roughly 63% higher than five years prior. A study by the Urban Institute found that growing numbers of Americans are relying on credit cards for groceries, with many unable to pay their balances in full.

Legislative Efforts and Bank Earnings

In February 2025, Sanders and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) introduced legislation to cap credit card interest rates at 10% for five years. These proposals have not become law, as banking groups oppose mandatory interest-rate caps, arguing they could restrict access to credit. The recent earnings season underscored the strength of the U.S. banking sector, with major lenders exceeding Wall Street expectations driven by solid consumer spending and robust trading revenue.

JPMorgan Chase & Co CFO Jeremy Barnum noted in an earnings call that consumers and small businesses remain resilient, with consumer spend growth continuing above last year's pace despite volatility in market and gas prices.

Major Bank Q2 Performance

Bank Q2 EPS Expected EPS Q2 Revenue Expected Revenue
Goldman Sachs $20.98 $14.10 $20.34 billion $16.05 billion
JPMorgan Chase & Co $6.14 $5.59 $50.02 billion $49.39 billion
Citigroup Inc $3.15 $2.67 $24.77 billion $23.47 billion
Wells Fargo & Co $1.96 $1.71 $22.62 billion $21.80 billion
Bank of America Corp $1.12 $1.11 $31.56 billion $30.32 billion

What is the likelihood of the Sanders-Hawley legislation gaining bipartisan traction in Congress given the current banking sector profitability?

How might major banks adjust their lending criteria and credit availability if a mandatory interest rate cap were to be implemented?

Could the Federal Reserve's potential future rate cuts provide sufficient relief to consumers without the need for legislative intervention?

like17
dislike

Bernie Sanders says AI wealth belongs to the public, not tech oligarchs

scanx
Reviewed by
Radhika SScanX News Team
Key Highlights

Sen. Bernie Sanders has introduced the American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act, proposing a one-time 50% tax on the stock of leading AI companies to establish a $7 trillion fund. The legislation aims to provide an annual dividend of $1,000 to every American, funded by a 5% return on the assets, and would be managed by an independent commission. The move has sparked a broader debate on AI governance, with figures like Aaron Levie and Sens. Mark Kelly and Adam Schiff weighing in on the economic and regulatory implications.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43386621

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) called for expanded public ownership of artificial intelligence-driven wealth, arguing that the rapidly growing sector is being shaped by a small group of powerful tech elites. In a post on X, Sanders warned that the future of AI should not be controlled exclusively by wealthy industry leaders. "We can no longer sit back and allow oligarchs decide the future of AI with zero input from the American people," he wrote. "That’s why I introduced the American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — to give the public a direct ownership stake."

AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Proposal Announced

Last week, Sanders introduced legislation that would require major AI companies to transfer 50% of their stock value into a federally managed sovereign wealth fund. The proposed "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act" was estimated by his office to potentially grow into a $7 trillion fund. Sanders said the plan aimed to ensure that the financial gains from artificial intelligence were shared broadly among the public rather than concentrated in the hands of major tech firms and wealthy investors.

Key Provisions of the Sanders Proposal

Feature Detail
Tax Rate 50% of stock (one-time)
Estimated Fund Size $7 trillion
Annual Payout per American $1,000 (based on 5% dividend)
Oversight Independent seven-member commission
Revenue Threshold for Inclusion $200 million

AI Policy Debate

The proposal has drawn mixed reactions from industry figures and policymakers. Box Inc. CEO Aaron Levie warned that uncertainty in AI governance could push countries toward open-weight models and reduce reliance on U.S.-controlled systems, arguing this shift increases incentives for sovereign AI development. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) said AI is rapidly transforming the U.S. economy and workforce, urging policies that ensure workers benefit from its growth under his "AI for America" plan. Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said public skepticism about Congress’s ability to regulate AI is justified, warning that lawmakers must prove they can keep up with fast-moving technological change while addressing its impact on jobs.

How might the proposed 50% stock transfer impact the investment strategies and valuations of major AI companies?

What are the potential legal challenges the legislation could face regarding property rights and government seizure of assets?

Could the establishment of this fund drive AI companies to relocate their headquarters to jurisdictions with more favorable tax and ownership regulations?

like18
dislike