Bernie Sanders says AI wealth belongs to the public, not tech oligarchs
Sen. Bernie Sanders has introduced the American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act, proposing a one-time 50% tax on the stock of leading AI companies to establish a $7 trillion fund. The legislation aims to provide an annual dividend of $1,000 to every American, funded by a 5% return on the assets, and would be managed by an independent commission. The move has sparked a broader debate on AI governance, with figures like Aaron Levie and Sens. Mark Kelly and Adam Schiff weighing in on the economic and regulatory implications.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) called for expanded public ownership of artificial intelligence-driven wealth, arguing that the rapidly growing sector is being shaped by a small group of powerful tech elites. In a post on X, Sanders warned that the future of AI should not be controlled exclusively by wealthy industry leaders. "We can no longer sit back and allow oligarchs decide the future of AI with zero input from the American people," he wrote. "That’s why I introduced the American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act — to give the public a direct ownership stake."
AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Proposal Announced
Last week, Sanders introduced legislation that would require major AI companies to transfer 50% of their stock value into a federally managed sovereign wealth fund. The proposed "American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act" was estimated by his office to potentially grow into a $7 trillion fund. Sanders said the plan aimed to ensure that the financial gains from artificial intelligence were shared broadly among the public rather than concentrated in the hands of major tech firms and wealthy investors.
Key Provisions of the Sanders Proposal
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Tax Rate | 50% of stock (one-time) |
| Estimated Fund Size | $7 trillion |
| Annual Payout per American | $1,000 (based on 5% dividend) |
| Oversight | Independent seven-member commission |
| Revenue Threshold for Inclusion | $200 million |
AI Policy Debate
The proposal has drawn mixed reactions from industry figures and policymakers. Box Inc. CEO Aaron Levie warned that uncertainty in AI governance could push countries toward open-weight models and reduce reliance on U.S.-controlled systems, arguing this shift increases incentives for sovereign AI development. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) said AI is rapidly transforming the U.S. economy and workforce, urging policies that ensure workers benefit from its growth under his "AI for America" plan. Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said public skepticism about Congress’s ability to regulate AI is justified, warning that lawmakers must prove they can keep up with fast-moving technological change while addressing its impact on jobs.
How might the proposed 50% stock transfer impact the investment strategies and valuations of major AI companies?
What are the potential legal challenges the legislation could face regarding property rights and government seizure of assets?
Could the establishment of this fund drive AI companies to relocate their headquarters to jurisdictions with more favorable tax and ownership regulations?
























