Sanders cites $97M in crypto donations to UK Reform Party

scanx
Reviewed by
Ritika DScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Sen. Bernie Sanders cited $97 million in donations from crypto billionaires to UK's Reform Party
  • Donors Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne each contributed roughly $48.7 billion
  • Farage faces investigation over a separate $6.65 million private gift from Harborne
  • Crypto super PAC Fairshake has contributed $88 million as of July 31
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
50917278

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Sen. Bernie Sanders highlighted the global reach of billionaire political influence on Sunday, pointing to $97 million in donations received by Nigel Farage’s Reform Party from cryptocurrency billionaires.

The independent senator stated that oligarchy is not confined to the United States. He argued that ultra-rich individuals are funding right-wing parties worldwide, asserting that democracy requires one person, one vote.

Donation Sources and Legal Background

According to a Wall Street Journal report cited by Sanders, two cryptocurrency billionaires, Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne, made the largest political donations in British history to the Reform Party.

Both donors contributed approximately $48.7 billion each to support the party ahead of the 2029 general elections. Harborne is known for early investments in Bitcoin and Ethereum. Delo is a co-founder and former executive of the cryptocurrency exchange BitMEX.

Delo, along with BitMEX co-founders Arthur Hayes and Samuel Reed, pleaded guilty in 2022 to violating the Bank Secrecy Act. They were accused of operating the exchange as a money laundering platform. President Donald Trump pardoned the three co-founders in March 2025.

Political Investigations and Industry Spending

Farage is currently facing an investigation regarding a private $6.65 million gift he received from Harborne in early 2024. Farage denies any wrongdoing in connection with the donation.

Sanders has consistently criticized large-scale political spending as legalized bribery. He advocates for overturning the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling and transitioning to public election funding.

The cryptocurrency industry has increased its political mobilization. Fairshake, a crypto-focused super PAC, has contributed $88 million as of July 31, reflecting the sector’s growing role in election cycles.

Donor Role Contribution Context
Ben Delo BitMEX co-founder Part of $97M total to Reform Party
Christopher Harborne Crypto investor Part of $97M total; separate $6.65M gift to Farage
Fairshake Super PAC $88M contributed by July 31

What the Numbers Show

The source data reveals a significant concentration of funding sources. Two individuals, Delo and Harborne, account for the entirety of the reported $97 million influx to the Reform Party. This indicates that the party’s recent financial surge relies heavily on a narrow base of high-net-worth individuals from the cryptocurrency sector rather than broad-based small-dollar donations.

How might the precedent of pardoning BitMEX co-founders influence future regulatory enforcement against cryptocurrency exchanges involved in financial crimes?

What impact could the Reform Party's reliance on crypto billionaire funding have on its policy platform regarding digital asset regulation in the UK?

Will the ongoing investigation into Nigel Farage's $6.65 million gift lead to stricter disclosure laws for political donations from foreign or unregulated sources?

like20
dislike

Sanders warns of Big Tech AI oligarchy, pushes for superintelligence ban

scanx
Reviewed by
Ritika DScanX News Team
Key Highlights
  • Sen. Bernie Sanders warns of Big Tech oligarchy controlling AI without public input
  • Sanders backs Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act to prohibit superintelligent AI
  • Proposal includes temporary pause on advanced AI until federal safety standards set
  • Sanders pushes for national data-center moratorium and public ownership stakes in AI labs
  • Industry leaders like Bill Ackman and Jensen Huang urge caution or focus on pragmatic risks
powered bylight_fuzz_icon
50386931

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) escalated his push for stricter artificial intelligence regulation on Monday, warning that a small group of Big Tech billionaires should not determine the technology's societal impact without public oversight.

Sanders Warns of AI ‘Oligarchy’

"The most pressing issue of our time is oligarchy & the power of Big Tech billionaires over AI," Sanders wrote on X. He added, "We can’t allow a handful of greedy people to play God & determine the future of humanity—our economy, environment, democracy, privacy & more—without public input."

He concluded with a call to action: "CONGRESS MUST ACT."

The comments came days after Sanders and Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) announced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act, one of Congress' most aggressive AI proposals yet.

Sanders Wants Superintelligence Banned

The legislation would permanently prohibit the development and deployment of superintelligent AI while temporarily pausing advanced AI development until a federal regulator establishes safety standards.

It also calls for international agreements to prevent superintelligence from being developed globally. The proposal has drawn criticism from investors and technology policy advocates.

Pershing Square founder Bill Ackman argued that halting U.S. development could allow geopolitical rivals to reach superintelligence first.

Sanders’ AI Push Expands to Data Centers, Public Ownership

Sanders has pushed for a national data-center moratorium, later working with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) to put the idea into legislation. While initially facing resistance from Democrats, similar calls have since gained bipartisan support.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has halted new data-center approvals pending reviews of their water and power needs. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro (D) now requires local approval for new projects.

In June, Sanders proposed giving the public ownership stakes in major AI labs, with the government having a say in deployment decisions. The idea echoes proposals from Anthropic and OpenAI.

Last week, Nvidia Corp (NASDAQ: NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang urged regulators to focus on real-world risks, saying, "Don’t regulate hypothetical theoretical harm, regulate actual and pragmatic harm."

Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ: MSFT) co-founder Bill Gates said he would support a credible global plan to slow AI advances, though he acknowledged such a plan is unlikely.

How might the proposed Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act impact U.S. competitiveness against geopolitical rivals like China if enacted?

What are the potential economic consequences for the tech sector if a national data-center moratorium gains broader bipartisan support?

Could the concept of public ownership stakes in AI labs gain traction among moderate Democrats, or will it remain a fringe proposal?

like18
dislike

More News on Bernie Sanders