Bitcoin protects wealth, not quick gains, says Ledger co-founder
Ledger co-founder Eric Larchevêque views Bitcoin as a tool to protect wealth from third-party risks inherent in traditional finance. He advocates for self-custody and long-term holding, citing personal banking failures and security incidents. Larchevêque advises investors to adopt a disciplined accumulation strategy rather than seeking quick gains.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Ledger co-founder Eric Larchevêque stated that Bitcoin is not a path to quick wealth but a way to protect the 'fruit' of one’s work in a world where bank deposits, gold custody, and fiat savings depend on third parties. In an interview with 'When Shift Happens' on June 25, Larchevêque explained that his conviction in Bitcoin was shaped by early experiences with the traditional financial system, including losing access to funds after a Latvian bank failed and being denied physical access to gold bars held through a Luxembourg bank.
Larchevêque argued that bank balances are ultimately claims on institutions, while Bitcoin held in self-custody is a final asset. He began moving heavily into Bitcoin around 2014, eventually placing almost all of his liquid net worth into the asset. He noted that he does not measure his wealth in euros but in the number of Bitcoins he owns.
Self-Custody and Security Risks
Larchevêque said Ledger was built to help users secure crypto assets, but he added that self-custody requires personal responsibility. He warned investors never to share their 24-word recovery phrase and advised large holders to avoid keeping direct access to their full holdings at home.
He also discussed the kidnapping of Ledger co-founder David Balland, who was tortured while criminals demanded a €10 million Bitcoin ransom from Larchevêque. The incident, he said, showed that physical security has become a major issue for visible crypto holders, especially in France.
Long-Term Investment Strategy
Despite Bitcoin’s volatility, Larchevêque said the only workable strategy is long-term conviction. He advised ordinary investors not to copy his all-in approach but instead to build a disciplined Bitcoin strategy through regular accumulation and only with money they do not need for daily life.
"The only people I know who had success with Bitcoin investment are the ones who forgot about it," he said.
How might the increasing physical security risks for high-profile crypto holders influence the adoption of institutional custody solutions?
What impact could widespread adoption of Bitcoin as a primary store of value have on the traditional banking system's reliance on deposits?
Will the need for personal responsibility in self-custody limit Bitcoin's appeal to the average retail investor?

































