SMC Global Securities fined ₹1 lakh by SEBI for compliance lapses
- SEBI imposed a ₹1,00,000 penalty on SMC Global Securities for regulatory violations
- Violations included failure to maintain client order records and supervise an authorized person
- Fixed payouts totaling ₹1,84,59,000 were made to 161 clients against investments of ₹6,11,27,000
- The company’s plea of double jeopardy due to parallel NSE proceedings was rejected by the adjudicating officer

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
SMC Global Securities received a penalty of ₹1,00,000 from the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for violating stock broker regulations related to client record maintenance and supervision of authorized persons.
The Adjudication Order, dated October 1, 2026, cited failures to maintain pre-order placement records and inadequate oversight of an authorized person (AP) who allegedly offered assured returns to clients. The penalty was levied under Section 15HB of the SEBI Act, 1992.
Inspection findings and violations
The penalty stems from a thematic inspection conducted by SEBI covering the period from January 1, 2024, to September 30, 2024. The regulator identified two primary non-compliances:
- Non-maintenance of records: The company failed to maintain appropriate evidence of client order placement for several clients, violating Regulation 9(b) of the Stock Brokers Regulations and SEBI Master Circulars.
- Lack of supervision: The company failed to adequately supervise an AP, Amit Lilhare, who was found to be facilitating unauthorized trading and offering fixed returns. The AP operated in the Bhilai and Rajnandgaon regions of Chhattisgarh.
Scale of irregularities
The adjudicating officer noted that out of 343 active clients mapped to the AP, a pattern of fixed payouts was observed in the ledgers of 161 clients. The total amount invested by these clients during the inspection period was ₹6,11,27,000, while the total fixed payouts made by the trading member to these clients amounted to ₹1,84,59,000.
| Metric | Figure |
|---|---|
| Total registered clients with AP | 581 |
| Active clients verified | 343 |
| Clients with fixed payout pattern | 161 |
| Total amount invested by clients | ₹6,11,27,000 |
| Total fixed payouts made | ₹1,84,59,000 |
Company defense and regulatory response
SMC Global Securities argued that it had already disabled the AP’s terminal in May 2024 and filed a police complaint before the SEBI inspection. The company also contended that parallel proceedings initiated by the National Stock Exchange (NSE) on the same subject matter should invoke the doctrine of double jeopardy.
However, the Adjudicating Officer rejected this argument, stating that Article 20(2) of the Constitution applies only to criminal proceedings, not quasi-judicial regulatory actions. The officer further noted that NSE and SEBI operate under distinct statutory mandates and jurisdictions.
What the numbers show
A critical divergence exists between the company’s claim of robust internal controls and the scale of undetected irregularities. Despite conducting an internal inspection of the AP in February 2024, which resulted in only minor observations, the subsequent SEBI analysis revealed that fixed payouts had been occurring since July 2022. This indicates a significant lag in detecting systemic misconduct, as the company failed to monitor undisclosed bank accounts where commissions were routed, allowing the violation to persist for over two years before external intervention.
The company has been directed to remit the penalty within 45 days. Failure to do so may lead to recovery proceedings under Section 28A of the SEBI Act.
Historical Stock Returns for SMC Global Securities
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.85% | +13.68% | +25.08% | +78.20% | +41.74% | +159.46% |
Will SEBI expand its thematic inspection scope to other regional brokers in Chhattisgarh given the scale of the unauthorized fixed-return schemes?
How might this adjudication influence the implementation of stricter AI-driven surveillance tools for detecting undisclosed commission routing among stock brokers?
What are the potential financial liabilities SMC Global Securities may face from client compensation claims beyond the regulatory penalty?


































