Schneider Electric Infra faces ₹12.16 lakh GST penalty
Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited faced a upheld GST demand of ₹9.58 lakh and a ₹12.16 lakh penalty from CGST Appeals Noida. The order confirmed liabilities for ineligible transitional CENVAT credits and hotel booking services, though it set aside a separate ₹2.84 lakh demand. The company reports no material operational impact.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Schneider Electric Infrastructure Limited received an appeal order from the Commissioner, CGST (Appeals), Noida, upholding a significant portion of a Goods and Services Tax (GST) demand related to wrongful availment of transitional credits. The appellate authority confirmed demands totaling ₹9,57,641 for ineligible CENVAT credits and ₹2,58,549 for input tax credit on hotel booking facilitation services lacking business nexus, while imposing a revised penalty of ₹12,16,190 under Sections 122 and 74 of the CGST Act, 2017. The company stated there is no material impact on its financials or operations beyond this specific liability and is evaluating appropriate legal remedies.
Regulatory Proceedings
The order, vide number NOI-CGST-001-APPL-324-2026-27 dated July 29, 2026, was received by the company on July 30, 2026. This development follows a demand notice issued earlier by the Joint Commissioner, Noida Tower II, alleging wrong availment of excess Input Tax Credit in TRANS1 for financial year 2017-18. The initial proceedings cited wrongful transition of ineligible CENVAT credit through Form GST TRAN-1 under Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Appeal Outcome Details
The Commissioner (Appeals) partly allowed the company’s appeal. While the authority set aside a demand of ₹2,83,584 relating to transit invoices recorded on July 31, 2017, it upheld the core allegations regarding specific cesses and service credits.
| Component | Amount (INR) | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Education Cess, SHE Cess & Krishi Kalyan Cess | 9,57,641 | Upheld |
| Hotel Booking Facilitation Services ITC | 2,58,549 | Upheld |
| Transit Invoices (July 31, 2017) | 2,83,584 | Set Aside |
| Penalty (Sections 122 & 74) | 12,16,190 | Imposed |
The department contended that the Education Cess, Secondary & Higher Education Cess, and Krishi Kalyan Cess were not eligible for transition under GST. Additionally, the input tax credit claimed for hotel booking facilitation services was deemed inadmissible due to a lack of evidence establishing a business nexus. The company disclosed this matter pursuant to Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations & Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Historical Stock Returns for Schneider Electric Infra
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.37% | -3.27% | -10.68% | +89.28% | +42.73% | +810.84% |
What specific legal remedies is Schneider Electric Infrastructure pursuing to challenge the upheld GST demands and penalties?
Could this appellate decision trigger a broader review of transitional credit claims across other Indian subsidiaries of Schneider Electric?
How might this ruling influence the tax authorities' approach to scrutinizing hotel booking facilitation services for business nexus in the future?


































