REC seeks waiver of exchange fines over board composition non-compliance
- REC seeks waiver of fines for Q1FY27 board composition non-compliance
- Authority to appoint Independent Directors rests with Ministry of Power
- Exchanges require full compliance before processing any waiver application
- Processing fee of ₹10,000 plus GST applies if fine exceeds ₹5,000

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
REC Ltd has submitted a request to the National Stock Exchange and BSE to waive fines levied for failing to maintain the required composition of its Board and Committees during the quarter ended June 30, 2026. The company attributes this non-compliance to its status as a government entity, where the authority to appoint directors rests with the President of India through the Ministry of Power.
Regulatory Notice and Board Response
The exchanges issued notices on August 25, 2026, highlighting REC's failure to comply with the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Specifically, the company did not meet the stipulated requirements for the number of Independent Directors on its Board. In response, REC's Board of Directors reviewed the matter in a meeting held on September 19, 2026.
The Board noted the position of non-compliance and the associated fines. It directed management to engage in regular follow-up with the Ministry of Power, Government of India, to expedite the appointment process for the requisite number of Independent Directors.
Grounds for Waiver Request
REC argues that as a Government Company, its Articles of Association vest the power to appoint Independent Directors exclusively with the President of India, acting through the administrative ministry. The company stated it has no role in these appointments, making the non-compliance beyond its direct control.
Key points from the submission include:
- The power to appoint Independent Directors is vested with the President of India via the Ministry of Power.
- REC has no role in the selection or appointment of these directors.
- Fines imposed by stock exchanges should be waived given the lack of corporate control over the compliance issue.
Compliance Framework and Waiver Process
The exchanges referenced SEBI Circular No. HO/49/14/14(7)2025-CFD-POD2/I/3762/2026, which outlines the standard operating procedure for imposing fines and suspending trading in cases of non-compliance. To apply for a waiver, companies must adhere to specific procedural requirements outlined by the exchanges.
| Requirement | Detail |
|---|---|
| Application Channel | NEAPS >> Compliance >> Fine Waiver >> Waiver Request |
| Processing Fee | ₹10,000 plus 18% GST (if fine exceeds ₹5,000) |
| Pre-requisite | Full compliance must be achieved before waiver processing |
| Submission Format | Detailed submission with reasons; email applications are not accepted |
The exchanges emphasized that compliance is a prerequisite for applying for a waiver. Applications for non-compliant companies will not be processed until the regulatory breach is rectified. Additionally, if a company is non-compliant under multiple regulations, it must file a single application detailing all respective regulations and quarters involved.
What the Numbers Show
The core tension in this filing lies in the structural disconnect between regulatory obligations and governance control. While SEBI mandates strict board composition for listed entities to ensure independent oversight, REC's governance structure places the appointment mechanism entirely outside the company's operational purview. This creates a scenario where the listed entity bears financial penalties for delays caused by a sovereign administrative process, highlighting a potential friction point in the regulation of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) versus private listed firms.
Historical Stock Returns for REC
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3.10% | -2.80% | -6.98% | -7.46% | -19.19% | 0.0% |
Will SEBI or the stock exchanges establish a standardized waiver framework for other government-owned listed entities facing similar structural governance constraints?
How might the delay in appointing Independent Directors impact REC's credit rating or cost of capital if the non-compliance persists beyond the current quarter?
Could this incident prompt legislative amendments to the Companies Act to clarify liability for compliance failures in state-owned enterprises?
































