Panabyte Technologies declares voting results for 45th AGM
- All eight resolutions passed with requisite majority at the 45th AGM
- Voting results declared on September 23, 2026, following e-voting scrutiny
- Remuneration revision resolutions received 668 votes against, unlike other items
- 30 shareholders participated via video conference, including 1 promoter

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Panabyte Technologies Limited has declared the voting results for its 45th Annual General Meeting (AGM), confirming that all proposed resolutions were passed by shareholders with the requisite majority.
The meeting, held on September 23, 2026, at 3:00 pm IST via video conference, saw the adoption of audited financial statements for FY26 and the reappointment of directors retiring by rotation. Special resolutions regarding remuneration revisions for the Chairman & Managing Director and Whole-Time Director also secured approval.
Resolutions and Governance Updates
Shareholders voted on several ordinary and special business items. The agenda included the adoption of financial statements and the reappointment of directors retiring by rotation. Notably, special resolutions were tabled to revise the remuneration terms for both the Chairman & Managing Director and the Whole-Time Director.
| Sr. No. | Particulars | Type of Resolution | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adoption of Audited Financial Statements for FY26 | Ordinary Resolution | Passed |
| 2 | Reappointment of Mr. Hetal Mavji Vichhivora (DIN: 03123060) | Ordinary Resolution | Passed |
| 3 | Approval of Related Party Transactions | Ordinary Resolution | Passed |
| 4 | Revision in Remuneration of Mr. Prakash Vichhivora (CMD) | Special Resolution | Passed |
| 5 | Revision in Remuneration of Mr. Hetal M. Vichhivora (WTD) | Special Resolution | Passed |
| 6 | Approval for Borrowing Powers under Section 180(1)(c) | Special Resolution | Passed |
| 7 | Approval for Loans/Investments under Section 186 | Special Resolution | Passed |
| 8 | Approval for Loans/Guarantees under Section 185(2) | Special Resolution | Passed |
Voting Participation and Scrutiny
The company extended remote e-voting facilities prior to the meeting and provided an e-voting system during the AGM for members who had not voted remotely. M/s. D. M. Zaveri & Co., Company Secretaries, served as the scrutinizer for the voting process to ensure transparency. The results were declared on September 23, 2026, and are available on the company website and the CDSL e-voting portal.
Participation data indicates that out of 3,096 shareholders on record as of September 16, 2026, 30 attended the meeting through video conferencing. This included one representative from the Promoter and Promoter Group and 29 public shareholders. Voting was conducted exclusively through e-voting, with no votes cast via poll during the meeting.
What the Numbers Show
The voting results highlight a divergence in shareholder sentiment across different agenda items. While routine governance matters such as the adoption of financial statements and director reappointments received near-unanimous support (99.9998% in favor), the special resolutions concerning remuneration revisions saw slightly higher dissent. Specifically, the revisions for Mr. Prakash Vichhivora and Mr. Hetal M. Vichhivora attracted 668 votes against, representing 0.0169% of the total valid votes polled. In contrast, borrowing powers and loan approvals under Sections 180, 186, and 185 faced only 8 votes against each. This suggests that while operational financing approvals were broadly accepted, a small segment of public non-institutional shareholders expressed reservations regarding executive compensation changes.
Historical Stock Returns for Panabyte Technologies
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.99% | +8.05% | -0.06% | -37.68% | -50.11% | +3.13% |
How will the newly approved borrowing powers under Section 180(1)(c) impact Panabyte Technologies' capital expenditure plans for FY27?
What specific strategic initiatives or expansion projects justify the revised remuneration packages for the CMD and WTD?
Will the low shareholder turnout (less than 1%) trigger any regulatory scrutiny or changes in the company's investor engagement strategy?


































