Naturo Agrotech FY26 Results: Net loss of ₹82.08 lakh, auditor issues qualified opinion
- Naturo Agrotech reported a net loss of ₹82.08 lakh in FY26, with zero revenue from operations
- Statutory auditor issued a qualified opinion citing contraventions of Sections 185, 186, and 73-76 of the Companies Act
- Loans and advances of ₹54.58 crore were flagged for lack of board resolutions and shareholder approval
- Cash and cash equivalents fell to ₹59,225 against short-term borrowings of ₹7.02 crore
*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Naturo Agrotech India Limited reported a net loss of ₹82.08 lakh for the financial year ended March 31, 2026. The company recorded zero revenue from operations, marking a stark contrast to the ₹2.05 crore revenue logged in the previous fiscal year.
The statutory auditor, H. Rajen & Co., issued a qualified opinion on the standalone financial results. The qualification stems from significant non-compliance with Sections 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013, regarding loans and advances, as well as Sections 73 to 76 concerning borrowings from parties other than directors and their relatives.
Financial Performance Overview
The company’s financial position deteriorated further in FY26, with total income collapsing to ₹1 compared to ₹2.06 crore in FY25. Total expenses stood at ₹32.08 lakh, driven primarily by depreciation and amortization charges of ₹45.30 lakh. Employee benefit expenses decreased to ₹9.77 lakh from ₹34.37 lakh in the prior year.
| Metric | FY26 (₹) | FY25 (₹) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | 0 | 2,05,16,875.47 |
| Other Income | 1.00 | 91,484.74 |
| Total Income | 1.00 | 2,06,08,360.21 |
| Total Expenses | 32,08,342.84 | 3,44,70,337.07 |
| Net Profit / (Loss) | (82,08,341.84) | (1,29,71,110.12) |
| Basic EPS (₹) | -0.44 | -0.69 |
Audit Qualifications and Compliance Issues
The auditor highlighted that loans and advances totaling ₹54.58 crore were granted to various parties in contravention of statutory provisions. No board resolutions or shareholder approvals were provided for these transactions, leaving the recoverability of these balances uncertain. Additionally, the company accepted borrowings of ₹8.04 crore from non-director entities without adhering to regulatory requirements, and failed to provide counter-party ledger confirmations.
Inventory valuation also raised concerns. The closing stock stood at ₹10.65 crore, but the auditor noted uncertainty regarding its existence and fair valuation due to the absence of a physical verification report. The management valued inventory only at cost, which is non-compliant with Ind AS 2 requiring valuation at the lower of cost or net realizable value.
Statutory Dues and Receivables
Significant overdue statutory liabilities were disclosed, including an outstanding income tax liability of ₹1.27 crore and unpaid TDS/TCS dues of ₹10.89 lakh. The auditor noted that while tax payments were made as per returns filed with the Income Tax department, corresponding entries were not recorded in the books of accounts for the past three years.
Trade receivables amounted to ₹14.84 crore as of March 31, 2026. The auditor was unable to verify these balances due to the lack of direct confirmation from debtors. Furthermore, the company did not maintain accounting software with an enabled edit log feature, limiting the ability to independently verify changes to financial records as required under Rule 3(1) of the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014.
What the Numbers Show
A critical divergence exists between the company’s asset base and its liquidity. While total assets remain substantial at ₹81.60 crore, cash and cash equivalents have dwindled to just ₹59,225. This extreme liquidity constraint is juxtaposed against short-term borrowings of ₹7.02 crore and trade payables of ₹25.44 crore, indicating severe pressure on near-term obligations. The concentration of assets in unverified loans and advances (₹54.58 crore) and inventory (₹10.65 crore) suggests that the balance sheet’s health is heavily dependent on assets whose existence and recoverability the auditor could not confirm.
What specific regulatory actions or penalties might SEBI or the Ministry of Corporate Affairs impose given the qualified audit opinion and non-compliance with Sections 185 and 186 of the Companies Act?
How will the inability to verify ₹54.58 crore in loans and advances impact the company's ability to secure future financing or attract institutional investors?
Given the severe liquidity crunch with only ₹59,225 in cash against ₹32.46 crore in short-term liabilities, is an insolvency proceeding or debt restructuring likely in the near term?
16
Access 50+ Readymade Screeners 
Use 200+ Custom Filters 
Get Full Market Insights 
