Naapbooks seeks approval for ₹25 crore related-party deals at AGM
- Naapbooks schedules 9th AGM for September 30, 2026, in Ahmedabad
- Shareholders to reappoint Ashish Jain as director retiring by rotation
- Approval sought for ₹25 crore aggregate related-party transaction cap
- Proex Advisors LLP linked to advances of ₹1128.76 lakh already paid
- Voting via physical poll; promoters must abstain on RPT resolutions

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Naapbooks Limited has scheduled its 9th Annual General Meeting for Wednesday, September 30, 2026, at 12:00 pm. The meeting will convene at the company's registered office in Ahmedabad to adopt financial statements for FY26 and approve key governance resolutions.
Shareholders will consider the reappointment of Mr. Ashish Jain as a director liable to retire by rotation. The Board recommends his reappointment based on performance evaluation by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Mr. Jain holds 12,00,384 equity shares, representing 11.08% of the company's capital as of March 31, 2026.
Related-Party Transaction Approvals
The agenda includes seeking shareholder approval for material related-party transactions with three entities for FY27. These transactions require approval under Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013, as they exceed the threshold of ₹121.83 lakh or 10% of annual consolidated turnover.
The company seeks to cap aggregate transactions with Proex Advisors LLP at ₹15 crore. Proex Consulting is capped at ₹5 crore, and Sanchal Projects Private Limited is capped at ₹5 crore. All transactions will be conducted at arm's length in the ordinary course of business.
| Entity | Relationship | Max Value (FY27) | Advances Paid | Key Personnel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proex Advisors LLP | Director's Firm (LLP) | ₹15 crore | ₹1128.76 lakh | Ashish Jain, Yaman Saluja |
| Proex Consulting | Director's Proprietorship | ₹5 crore | Nil | Ashish Jain |
| Sanchal Projects Pvt Ltd | Entity where Director has interest | ₹5 crore | ₹0.27 lakh | Abhishek Jain |
Proex Advisors LLP involves IT services, loans, and property leasing. Proex Consulting focuses on IT and digital engineering services. Sanchal Projects covers IT services, interior architecture, and furniture purchases.
What the Numbers Show
The disclosure reveals a significant concentration of related-party exposure with entities linked to Director Ashish Jain. Between Proex Advisors LLP and Proex Consulting, the potential transaction value reaches ₹20 crore, accounting for 80% of the total ₹25 crore related-party cap. Notably, Proex Advisors LLP already has ₹1128.76 lakh in advances paid or received, indicating substantial existing financial interdependence before the new fiscal year begins.
Voting and Logistics
Voting will be conducted via physical poll using Form MGT-12, as the company is not obligated to offer e-voting under Section 108 of the Companies Act, 2013. The record date for voting eligibility is Saturday, September 19, 2026. Promoters and related parties are required to abstain from voting on the related-party transaction resolutions.
The company dispatched the notice and integrated annual report electronically to registered email addresses. Physical intimation letters with QR codes were sent to members without registered emails or mobile numbers.
Historical Stock Returns for Naapbooks
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -3.23% | +2.06% | 0.0% | +65.14% | +7.18% | 0.0% |
How might the significant concentration of related-party transactions with entities linked to Director Ashish Jain impact minority shareholder confidence and the company's stock valuation?
What specific risk mitigation controls will Naapbooks implement to ensure these high-value related-party transactions remain strictly at arm's length despite the existing financial interdependence?
Given that Proex Advisors LLP already has over ₹112 crore in advances, what is the strategic rationale for capping future transactions at ₹15 crore, and does this signal a planned reduction in reliance on this vendor?


































