Music Broadcast faces ₹11.58 Cr GST demand for FY23
- Music Broadcast received a Show Cause Notice demanding ₹11.58 crore for FY 2022-23.
- The notice alleges short payment of output tax and ineligible ITC claims.
- The company disputes the allegations and plans to file a detailed response.
- Management stated no material financial impact is expected currently.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Music Broadcast received a Show Cause Notice from the Uttar Pradesh State GST Authority demanding approximately ₹11.58 crore regarding alleged tax shortfalls for FY 2022-23.
The notice, dated September 21, 2026, was issued by the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Lucknow. It alleges a mismatch in tax liability reflected in GSTR-7/GSTR-8 versus GSTR-3B returns and claims ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) on inward supplies from certain vendors.
Breakdown of Demand
The authority has outlined specific components contributing to the total demand under Section 73(1) of the UP GST Act, 2017.
| Component | Amount (₹) |
|---|---|
| Short payment of output tax | 10,52,56,145 |
| Penalty | 1,05,25,614 |
| Total Demand | 11,57,81,759 |
The alleged short payment of output tax of approximately ₹5,723.81 lakh concerns a discrepancy sought to be taxed at 18%. Additionally, the department identified ineligible ITC claims of ₹6,72,923 (IGST) and ₹7,76,682 each (CGST/SGST), arguing these were not in the course of business. A minor shortfall of ₹639 each in CGST/SGST under reverse charge mechanism was also flagged.
Company Response
Music Broadcast stated it does not agree with the allegations. The company intends to submit a detailed reply supported by relevant records and reconciliations within the prescribed timeline. Management noted that as this is a Show Cause Notice and not a final order, it does not anticipate any material financial impact at this stage.
What the Numbers Show
The penalty component constitutes exactly 10% of the disputed tax amount of ₹10.53 crore. This precise proportionality suggests a standard application of statutory penalties rather than an escalated punitive measure for the alleged irregularities in ITC availment and tax liability reporting.
Historical Stock Returns for Music Broadcast
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1.33% | -0.81% | -7.85% | -7.85% | -7.85% | -7.85% |
How will the company's legal defense costs and management resources be impacted while contesting this notice?
Could this scrutiny from the UP GST Authority trigger similar audits or notices for previous financial years?
What is the likelihood of other state tax authorities launching parallel investigations based on the allegations in this notice?


































