Margo Finance Q1 Results: Net profit surges 666% YoY to ₹16.94 lakh
Margo Finance Limited posted a net profit of ₹16.94 lakh in Q1FY27, up 666% YoY, fueled by ₹26.99 lakh in gains from investment sales. While total revenue rose 176% to ₹36.16 lakh, core operational incomes like interest and fees declined. Statutory auditors Pawan Shubham & Co. issued a limited review report on the results approved by the Board on August 4, 2026.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Margo Finance Limited reported a net profit of ₹16.94 lakh for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (Q1FY27), marking a 666% surge compared to ₹2.21 lakh in the corresponding period of the previous year. The sharp rise in profitability was driven largely by investment activities, with total revenue from operations climbing 176% year-on-year to ₹36.16 lakh from ₹13.10 lakh. This performance underscores the company's reliance on capital markets for revenue generation during the period.
The Board of Directors approved the unaudited standalone financial results at a meeting held on August 4, 2026. The results were reviewed by the Audit Committee and subjected to a limited review by Pawan Shubham & Co., the statutory auditors of the company, pursuant to Regulation 30 and 33 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
Financial Performance Highlights
Total income for the quarter remained at ₹36.16 lakh as there was no other income recorded. Expenses increased to ₹13.36 lakh from ₹9.84 lakh in Q1FY26, primarily due to a rise in other expenses to ₹9.52 lakh from ₹6.08 lakh. Employee benefit expenses saw a marginal increase to ₹3.51 lakh from ₹3.46 lakh, while depreciation and amortization expenses rose slightly to ₹0.33 lakh from ₹0.30 lakh.
| Particulars | Q1FY27 (₹ in lacs) | Q1FY26 (₹ in lacs) | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest Income | 0.72 | 1.13 | -36.3% |
| Fees and Commission Income | 8.45 | 11.06 | -23.6% |
| Net Gain on Sale of Investments | 26.99 | 0.75 | 3,500.0% |
| Total Revenue from Operations | 36.16 | 13.10 | 176.0% |
| Total Expenses | 13.36 | 9.84 | 35.8% |
| Profit Before Tax | 22.80 | 3.26 | 599.4% |
| Tax Expense | 5.86 | 1.05 | 458.1% |
| Net Profit After Tax | 16.94 | 2.21 | 666.5% |
Earnings per share (basic and diluted) stood at ₹0.37, up from ₹0.05 in the previous year's quarter. Paid-up equity share capital remained unchanged at ₹457.00 lakh.
What the Numbers Show
The primary driver of the profit surge was the net gain on the sale of investments, which jumped to ₹26.99 lakh from ₹0.75 lakh in Q1FY26. This indicates that operational revenues—comprising interest income, dividend income, and fees/commission—actually declined or stagnated. Interest income fell 36.3% to ₹0.72 lakh, and fees and commission income dropped 23.6% to ₹8.45 lakh. Dividend income, which contributed ₹0.16 lakh in the prior year, was nil in the current quarter. Consequently, the company's core operational revenue generation weakened, making the bottom line heavily dependent on one-off capital gains from investment disposals rather than sustainable business operations.
Additionally, Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) recorded a significant positive balance of ₹7,981.50 lakh, driven by changes in the fair value of financial assets designated to OCI (₹10,664.17 lakh), partially offset by related tax provisions. This contrasts with a negative OCI of ₹928.70 lakh in the preceding quarter, highlighting volatility in the valuation of the company's financial assets.
Historical Stock Returns for Margo Finance
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.37% | +0.11% | -8.35% | -8.49% | -23.01% | +117.52% |
How sustainable is Margo Finance's profitability given that core operational revenues (interest and fees) declined while profits surged due to one-off investment gains?
What is the current composition of Margo Finance's investment portfolio, and does the significant positive OCI suggest a shift towards higher-risk or more volatile financial assets?
Will management implement strategic initiatives to reverse the 23.6% decline in fees and commission income, or will the company continue to rely on capital markets for revenue generation?































