Judge denies Google and Meta motions for new trial in youth addiction case
A California judge denied motions by Meta and Google seeking a new trial after a jury found them liable for designing harmful social media platforms. The ruling upholds the $6 million damages awarded. Judge Carolyn Kuhl's decision reinforces the jury's negligence finding.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
A California state court judge denied motions by Meta Platforms and Google's YouTube seeking a new trial after a jury found them liable for designing social media platforms that are harmful to young people. The ruling upholds the previous verdict, which found the companies negligent and imposed $6 million in damages.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carolyn Kuhl ruled on the motions on Tuesday, according to court documents. The order detailing her reasoning was not immediately available. The companies had sought a new trial following the jury's decision.
The case centers on allegations that Meta and Google's platforms were designed in ways that contribute to youth social media addiction. The jury's initial verdict held the companies accountable for negligence in their design practices.
The $6 million in damages awarded by the jury remains in effect following the judge's decision. The denial of the motions for a new trial marks a significant development in the ongoing legal scrutiny of social media companies' impact on young users.
Will this ruling encourage similar lawsuits in other states against social media companies?
How might Meta and Google modify their platform designs in response to the verdict?
Could this decision lead to increased regulatory scrutiny of social media's impact on youth?




























