IRCTC ordered to deposit ₹50.41 Cr plus interest in GST profiteering case
- GSTAT ordered IRCTC to deposit ₹50,41,44,461 plus 18% interest
- Interest accrues from June 28, 2019, under CGST Rules
- A 10% penalty applies if payment is not made within 30 days
- IRCTC is filing an appeal before the competent court
*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd has been directed by the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) to deposit ₹50,41,44,461 along with 18% interest in the Consumer Welfare Funds. This order stems from allegations of profiteering related to services provided between June 28, 2019, and subsequent periods.
The tribunal passed the final order on October 14, 2026, accepting the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) report and rejecting all objections raised by the corporation. The deposit must be made within one month, split equally between the Central and State Consumer Welfare Funds based on state-wise bifurcation.
Financial Implications and Penalties
The total liability includes the principal amount calculated as the profiteered amount plus interest at 18% per annum under Rule 133(3)(c) of the CGST Rules, 2017. If IRCTC fails to make the deposit within 30 days of the order, an additional penalty of 10% will be levied on the outstanding amount.
| Component | Details |
|---|---|
| Principal Amount | ₹50,41,44,461 |
| Interest Rate | 18% per annum |
| Interest Start Date | June 28, 2019 |
| Penalty for Delay | 10% of amount if not paid in 30 days |
| Fund Allocation | 50:50 split between Central and State Welfare Funds |
Legal Status and Appeal
IRCTC has stated that an appeal against the GSTAT order is being preferred before the competent court of jurisdiction. The litigation dates back to June 26, 2020, when the dispute was initiated with the Competition Commission of India (erstwhile GSTAT authority). In the previous status update, the tribunal had granted two weeks to file invoices and computation notes as a final opportunity, which has now resulted in this adverse final order.
What the Numbers Show
The directive highlights a significant cash outflow risk tied to regulatory compliance rather than operational performance. With the interest rate set at 18% from mid-2019, the accrued interest component is substantial relative to the principal, emphasizing the cost of prolonged litigation in anti-profiteering cases. The requirement to bifurcate payments across state funds adds administrative complexity to the settlement.
Historical Stock Returns for IRCTC
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.62% | +3.46% | +1.39% | -12.74% | -33.35% | -57.05% |
How might IRCTC's appeal in the competent court impact the timeline for the ₹50 crore cash outflow and its short-term liquidity position?
Could this adverse ruling set a precedent that triggers similar anti-profiteering investigations into other large public sector undertakings providing consumer services?
What is the potential impact on IRCTC's credit rating and borrowing costs if the regulatory liability is recognized as a contingent loss before the final appellate outcome?
Create Custom Screeners 
Access 200+ Pre-built Filters 
Use 50+ Readymade Screener 
