Interworld Digital Q1 Results: Loss widens 225% YoY to ₹19.17 lakh
Interworld Digital Limited posted a Q1FY26 net loss of ₹19.17 lakh against zero revenue, reflecting ongoing operational paralysis after a former MD diverted its business. Statutory auditors flagged ₹1.91 crore in unpaid dues and unfiled returns since FY11-12. The Board appointed Hritika Verma as the new Company Secretary to manage compliance amid these challenges.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Interworld Digital Limited reported a net loss of ₹19.17 lakh for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (Q1FY26), a sharp deterioration from the ₹5.89 lakh loss recorded in the corresponding period of FY25. The company generated zero revenue from operations during the quarter, continuing a prolonged period of operational dormancy attributed to the fraudulent diversion of its core business and intellectual property by former Managing Director Mr. Manmohan Gupta.
The financial results were approved by the Board of Directors at a meeting held on August 12, 2026, alongside the Limited Review Report issued by statutory auditors Nemani Garg Agarwal & Co. The auditors qualified their conclusion on the standalone financial results, citing significant irregularities including the absence of operational revenue since the business shift and outstanding statutory dues.
Financial Performance
The company’s total expenses for the quarter stood at ₹19.17 lakh, driven primarily by employee benefit expenses of ₹3.48 lakh and other expenses amounting to ₹15.68 lakh. With no income from operations or other sources to offset these costs, the loss before tax matched total expenses at ₹19.17 lakh. No tax expense was recognized for the period.
| Metric: | Q1FY26 | Q1FY25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations: | ₹0 lakh | ₹0 lakh | — |
| Total Expenses: | ₹19.17 lakh | ₹5.89 lakh | +225% |
| Net Loss: | ₹19.17 lakh | ₹5.89 lakh | Widened |
Auditor Observations and Liabilities
Nemani Garg Agarwal & Co. highlighted several critical matters in their review report:
- Business Diversion: The auditors confirmed that there has been no revenue from operations for a long time because the past MD shifted the entire business to his own entity. The company is reportedly making efforts to recover this business.
- Statutory Dues: Outstanding service tax, TDS, and professional tax aggregating to ₹1.91 crore remain unpaid since FY09-10. Service tax returns have not been filed since FY11-12, with no provision made for associated interest or penalties.
- ROC Fees Dispute: A provision of ₹55.97 lakh exists for ROC fees related to an authorized capital increase in FY10-11. The company is challenging the applicability of revised fees under the Companies Act, 2013, via a writ petition pending in the Delhi High Court.
- Investments and Receivables: The company has not disclosed the realizable value of ₹1.47 crore invested in unquoted non-current investments, preventing impairment estimation. Management maintains that all outstanding debtors are fully realizable, contrary to IND AS 109 requirements for estimated credit losses.
Corporate Actions
The Board also transacted administrative business during the meeting:
- Resignation: Mrs. Shivangi Agarwal resigned as Company Secretary and Compliance Officer effective June 30, 2026.
- Appointment: Ms. Hritika Verma was appointed as the new Company Secretary and Compliance Officer effective August 12, 2026. She is a Qualified Company Secretary and Associate Member of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India.
What the Numbers Show
The divergence between the static paid-up equity capital of ₹4,783.77 lakh and the negligible operational activity underscores the company's current status as a shell entity in transition. While the balance sheet retains substantial reserves (₹3,524.53 lakh as per the previous year), the absence of revenue combined with persistent compliance liabilities—specifically the ₹1.91 crore in unpaid statutory dues and the pending ROC fee litigation—indicates that the company’s near-term focus remains on legal recovery and regulatory cleanup rather than commercial operations.
What specific legal strategies is Interworld Digital pursuing to reclaim its diverted business and intellectual property from the former MD's entity?
How might the resolution of the Delhi High Court writ petition regarding ROC fees impact the company's liquidity and regulatory standing?
Will the company initiate a fresh capital raise or asset sale to clear the ₹1.91 crore in outstanding statutory dues and associated penalties?

































