Interworld Digital reports net loss of ₹26.05 lakh in FY26
Interworld Digital Limited reported a net loss of ₹26.05 lakh for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, with zero revenue from operations. The loss widened from ₹22.24 lakh in the previous year, attributed to non-functional operations due to alleged fraudulent diversion of business. The company faces significant audit qualifications, outstanding statutory dues, and loan defaults.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Interworld Digital Limited reported a net loss of ₹26.05 lakh for the financial year ended March 31, 2026, as the company continues to record zero revenue from operations. The standalone audited financial results, approved by the Board on May 28, 2026, reveal a total loss for the period at ₹26.05 lakh, widening from the previous year's loss of ₹22.24 lakh. The company’s operations have been non-functional due to the alleged fraudulent diversion of its business and intellectual property by a former managing director.
Financial Performance
The company recorded no income from operations for the quarter and year ended March 31, 2026. Total expenses for the year amounted to ₹26.05 lakh, driven primarily by employee benefit expenses of ₹13.42 lakh and other expenses of ₹12.55 lakh. The basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) for the year stood at a loss of ₹0.01. The paid-up equity share capital remained constant at ₹4,783.77 lakh.
| Particulars | Year Ended 31-Mar-26 (Audited) | Year Ended 31-Mar-25 (Audited) |
|---|---|---|
| Net Sales/Revenue from Operations | - | 2.88 |
| Total Expenses | 26.05 | 25.12 |
| Profit/(Loss) for the period | (26.05) | (22.24) |
| Basic EPS (₹) | (0.01) | (0.00) |
Audit Qualifications and Compliance Issues
M/s Nemani Garg Agarwal & Co., the statutory auditors, issued a qualified opinion in their report. The auditors highlighted that the past Managing Director, Mr. Manmahon Gupta, fraudulently shifted the entire business and intellectual property to his own entity, resulting in no operational revenue. Additionally, the auditors noted that statutory dues, including Service Tax, TDS, and Professional Tax aggregating to ₹1.91 crore, have been outstanding since FY 2009-10, with no provision made for interest or penalties.
The report also pointed out that the company has not provided for estimated credit loss on outstanding debtors amounting to ₹1,303.55 lakh, nor has it disclosed the realizable value of unquoted non-current investments of ₹1.47 crore. The auditors further emphasized that there has been no business revenue or movement in the majority of assets and liabilities for a considerable time.
Defaults and Liabilities
Interworld Digital Limited has disclosed defaults in loan repayments. The company defaulted on the last installment of a vehicle loan from Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited, with an outstanding balance of ₹0.06 crore as on March 31, 2026. The total financial indebtedness, including short-term and long-term debt, stands at ₹1.61 crore. The company also faces a contingent liability regarding differential Registrar of Companies (ROC) fees of ₹55.97 lakh, related to a revision in authorized share capital from ₹21 crore to ₹70 crore during FY 2010-11. A writ petition challenging this fee revision is currently pending in the Delhi High Court.
Board Decisions
During the meeting held on May 28, 2026, the Board reappointed M/s Sanghi & Co., Chartered Accountants, as the internal auditor for the financial year 2026-27 based on the recommendation of the Audit Committee. The Board also took on record the Statement of Impact of Audit Qualification. The company noted that it has not paid annual listing fees to the Bombay Stock Exchange Limited since FY 2018-19, and consequently, its shares are traded on a trade-for-trade basis only on the first trading day of every week.
What is the expected timeline for the legal resolution regarding the alleged fraudulent diversion of business by the former managing director?
How does the company plan to settle the outstanding statutory dues of ₹1.91 crore pending since FY 2009-10?
Will the pending writ petition in the Delhi High Court regarding the differential ROC fees impact the company's authorized share capital structure?






























