Emmvee Photovoltaic Power shareholders pass all four AGM resolutions
- All four AGM resolutions passed with requisite majority
- Total votes polled: 62,89,53,055 (90.84% of outstanding shares)
- Director appointment saw highest dissent at 0.66%
- Public institutions voted 87.25% of their holdings; non-institutions only 0.24%

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Emmvee Photovoltaic Power Limited shareholders voted in favour of all four resolutions proposed at the company's 19th Annual General Meeting (AGM), held on September 25, 2026. The meeting, conducted via video conferencing, saw a total of 62,89,53,055 votes polled out of 69,23,45,033 outstanding shares.
The resolutions covered the adoption of financial statements, declaration of dividend, appointment of a director, and ratification of cost auditor remuneration. The scrutinizer’s report confirmed that each resolution was passed with the requisite majority under the Companies Act, 2013 and SEBI Listing Regulations.
Voting participation details
The record date for the meeting was September 18, 2026, with 1,64,652 shareholders on the register. Voting was conducted through remote e-voting and electronic voting at the AGM, facilitated by National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL).
| Metric | Count |
|---|---|
| Total outstanding shares | 69,23,45,033 |
| Total votes polled | 62,89,53,055 |
| Percentage of shares voted | 90.84% |
| Members voting via remote e-voting | 465 |
| Members voting at AGM | 1 |
Resolution outcomes
All four items on the agenda were classified as ordinary business or special business requiring ordinary resolution status. Promoter and promoter group members voted in favour of all resolutions without dissent.
Adoption of financial statements
The adoption of financial statements received overwhelming support. Out of 62,89,53,055 total votes polled, 62,89,21,656 were in favour and 31,399 were against. Public institutions held 87.25% of their shares in vote, while public non-institutions participated with only 0.24% of their holding.
Declaration of dividend
The resolution regarding the declaration of dividend was also approved. A total of 62,89,52,949 votes were polled, with 62,89,52,871 in favour and just 78 against. The margin of support was near-unanimous across all shareholder categories.
Appointment of director
Mr. Suhas Donthi Manjunatha was appointed as a director liable to retire by rotation. This resolution saw the highest dissent among the four items. Of the 62,89,52,919 votes polled, 62,47,97,739 were in favour and 41,55,180 were against. Public institutions recorded 5.56% dissent, while public non-institutions recorded 0.99% dissent.
Ratification of cost auditor remuneration
The ratification of remuneration payable to cost auditors for FY27 was approved with 62,89,52,518 votes in favour and 401 against. The low number of dissenting votes indicates strong shareholder alignment on governance costs.
What the numbers show
A comparison of voting patterns reveals a distinct divergence in shareholder engagement based on institutional status. While public institutions participated actively, casting 87.25% of their eligible votes on most resolutions, public non-institutional shareholders demonstrated significantly lower engagement, casting only 0.24% of their eligible votes. This suggests that retail or individual investors had minimal impact on the outcome compared to institutional holders. Furthermore, the appointment of Mr. Suhas Donthi Manjunatha attracted notably higher dissent from public institutions (5.56%) compared to other routine administrative resolutions, which saw negligible opposition (<0.1%).
Historical Stock Returns for Emmvee Photovoltaic Power
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1.97% | -3.80% | -5.44% | +38.21% | +43.82% | +43.82% |
How will the appointment of Mr. Suhas Donthi Manjunatha influence Emmvee Photovoltaic's strategic direction in the competitive solar manufacturing sector?
What specific operational or financial factors drove the 5.56% institutional dissent against the director appointment, and how might this affect future board decisions?
Given the near-total disengagement of retail shareholders (0.24% participation), what measures is the company considering to improve retail investor confidence and voting participation?
































