East West Holdings Freight Q1 Results: Net profit turns positive at ₹22.05 lakh
East West Holdings Freight Carriers Ltd turned profitable in Q1FY26 with a consolidated net profit of ₹22.05 lakh, up from a loss of ₹32.15 lakh YoY. Revenue declined 19% to ₹4,556.25 lakh, but expenses fell faster at 20.8%, driving the margin improvement. The subsidiary Unique Airfreight contributed ₹29.68 lakh profit.
*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
East West Holdings Freight Carriers Limited East West Holdings Freight Carriers returned to profitability in the first quarter of FY26, reporting a consolidated net profit of ₹22.05 lakh for the three months ended June 30, 2026. This marks a significant improvement from the net loss of ₹32.15 lakh recorded in the same quarter of FY25.
The company’s Board of Directors approved the unaudited standalone and consolidated financial results during a meeting held on August 12, 2026. The results were subjected to a limited review by statutory auditors Mittal & Associates, who issued an unqualified report.
Financial Performance
Consolidated revenue from operations stood at ₹4,556.25 lakh, down 19.4% year-on-year from ₹5,655.71 lakh in Q1FY25. On a sequential basis, revenue increased slightly by 2.8% from ₹4,431.29 lakh in Q4FY25.
Standalone revenue from operations was ₹4,069.47 lakh, representing a 23.9% decline compared to ₹5,346.41 lakh in the prior year’s quarter. The standalone entity posted a net loss of ₹0.21 lakh, narrowing significantly from the loss of ₹53.00 lakh in Q1FY25.
| Metric | Q1FY26 (Consolidated) | Q1FY25 (Consolidated) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | ₹4,556.25 lakh | ₹5,655.71 lakh | -19.4% |
| Total Expenses | ₹4,509.51 lakh | ₹5,694.90 lakh | -20.8% |
| Net Profit/(Loss) | ₹22.05 lakh | (₹32.15 lakh) | Turnaround |
What the Numbers Show
The return to profitability was driven primarily by a sharper decline in total expenses than in revenue. Consolidated total expenses fell 20.8% year-on-year to ₹4,509.51 lakh, outpacing the 19.4% drop in revenue. This divergence improved the operating margin before tax to 1.0% (₹46.47 lakh profit before tax), compared to a negative margin in the prior year.
Cost of materials consumed, the largest expense head, decreased 24.0% to ₹3,645.13 lakh. Employee benefits expense saw a modest 1.6% increase to ₹381.94 lakh, while other expenses contracted 1.3% to ₹201.89 lakh. Finance costs remained relatively stable at ₹236.94 lakh, down 1.6% from ₹258.04 lakh in Q1FY25.
Subsidiary Contribution
The consolidated results include the financials of its subsidiary, M/s Unique Airfreight Express & Logistics Private Limited. The subsidiary contributed ₹496.66 lakh in revenue and reported a net profit after tax of ₹29.68 lakh for the quarter. This profit contribution was material to the group’s overall turnaround, offsetting the near-breakeven performance of the standalone parent entity.
Tax and Other Items
Total tax expense for the consolidated entity was ₹17.00 lakh, comprising ₹10.00 lakh in current tax and ₹7.00 lakh in deferred tax. In contrast, the prior year saw a tax credit of ₹0.50 lakh (₹8.00 lakh current tax expense offset by ₹8.50 lakh deferred tax benefit).
Other income was negligible, recording a negative balance of ₹0.26 lakh in Q1FY26, compared to ₹13.49 lakh in Q1FY25. The company operates primarily in the freight services segment, with no separate segment reporting disclosed as per Ind AS 108.
Historical Stock Returns for East West Holdings Freight Carriers
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.09% | -0.41% | -0.41% | -0.41% | -0.41% | -0.41% |
Can the company sustain its profitability in Q2FY26 given the 19.4% year-on-year revenue decline, or was this turnaround primarily a one-off result of aggressive cost-cutting?
How does the subsidiary Unique Airfreight Express's strong performance influence the group's strategic focus, and are there plans to expand its operations to offset the parent entity's stagnation?
With employee benefits rising while other expenses contracted, what specific operational efficiencies or structural changes drove the 24% drop in material costs?
15
Access Market Heat-map & Insights 
Create, Save & Share your Screener 
Use 200+ Screening Filters 
