Dreamfolks Services gets GST demand of ₹1.35 crore set aside
- GST Appellate Authority set aside a ₹1.35 crore tax demand against Dreamfolks Services
- Penalty of ₹13.5 lakh related to the same dispute was also cancelled
- Order overturns August 2024 demand regarding ITC discrepancies for FY20
- Company stated no immediate quantifiable monetary impact on operations
*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Dreamfolks Services received a favourable order from the GST Appellate Authority setting aside a tax demand of ₹1.35 crore and a penalty of ₹13.5 lakh. The decision, dated October 14, 2026, resolves a dispute concerning Input Tax Credit claims for the fiscal year 2019-20.
The Office of the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (Appeals-II), Mumbai, overturned the previous demand order issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Division-VI CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate. The original demand was raised on August 31, 2024, alleging incorrect Input Tax Credit claims due to discrepancies between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A filings.
Details of the Regulatory Order
The company disclosed the development under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The appellate authority’s ruling effectively nullifies the financial liability associated with the alleged contravention for the specified period.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Authority | Office of the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (Appeals-II), Mumbai |
| Order Date | October 14, 2026 |
| Original Demand Date | August 31, 2024 |
| Tax Demand Set Aside | ₹1.35 crore |
| Penalty Set Aside | ₹13.5 lakh |
| Period Under Review | Financial Year 2019-20 |
Nature of the Dispute
The core issue involved the company’s claim of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The lower authority had flagged differences between the ITC reported in GSTR-3B and the data available in GSTR-2A during the year 2019-20. The appellate authority’s decision to set aside the demand indicates that these discrepancies were either justified or procedurally invalid under the applicable GST laws.
Impact on Operations
In its disclosure, Dreamfolks stated that the impact on its financial, operational, or other activities is not quantifiable in monetary terms at this stage, marked as "NA" in the regulatory filing. The removal of this contingent liability eliminates the risk of interest accumulation on the disputed amount and provides clarity on past tax compliance issues.
Historical Stock Returns for Dreamfolks Services
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.70% | +1.10% | -8.06% | -20.08% | -59.58% | -86.85% |
Will this favorable appellate ruling encourage Dreamfolks Services to pursue further litigation against other pending tax demands or reassessments?
How might this precedent influence the GST department's future scrutiny strategies regarding Input Tax Credit discrepancies for companies in the same sector?
Does the resolution of the FY 2019-20 dispute signal a broader cleanup of historical compliance issues ahead of potential capital market activities or fundraising?
16
Create Custom Screeners 
Access 200+ Pre-built Filters 
Use 50+ Readymade Screener 
