Arkade Developers 40th AGM passes all six resolutions with 81.30% votes polled
- All six resolutions at Arkade Developers' 40th AGM on September 22, 2026 were passed, with 81.30% of 18,56,63,617 outstanding shares polled
- Promoter and promoter group polled 12,91,99,848 votes (97.74% of holdings), voting entirely in favour across all resolutions
- ESOP 2026 introduction and its extension to subsidiary employees passed as special resolutions with 99.21% of votes in favour, despite 99.39% opposition from public institutional holders
- Re-appointment of Arpit Vikram Jain passed with 99.87% of votes in favour; public institutions voted 16.62% against
- Voting results and scrutinizer's report by M/s AVS & Associates were submitted to stock exchanges on September 24, 2026

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Arkade Developers Limited concluded its 40th Annual General Meeting on September 22, 2026, with all six resolutions passed and voting results submitted to stock exchanges on September 24, 2026.
The meeting was held through video conferencing and other audio-visual means, in compliance with Ministry of Corporate Affairs and SEBI circulars. A total of 57 members attended the session, which commenced at 3:00 pm and concluded at 4:06 pm. The scrutinizer's report was issued by CS Vijay Yadav, Partner of M/s AVS & Associates, Practicing Company Secretaries, dated September 23, 2026, pursuant to Regulation 44(3) of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Remote e-voting was conducted via BIGSHARE, commencing September 18, 2026 at 9:00 am IST and closing September 21, 2026 at 5:00 pm IST. The cut-off date for determining eligible shareholders was September 15, 2026.
Resolutions passed
Shareholders adopted the audited standalone and consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended March 31, 2026. The Board of Directors' reports and auditors' opinions were received without any qualifications or adverse comments on financial transactions or secretarial matters. The following special business items were also approved: introduction and implementation of the Arkade Employees Stock Option Plan (ESOP) 2026; extension of benefits under the Arkade ESOP 2026 to employees and directors of subsidiary companies. Additionally, members ratified the remuneration of cost auditors for FY27 and re-appointed Mr. Arpit Vikram Jain as a director retiring by rotation.
Voting results summary
Across all six resolutions, total votes polled stood at 15,09,49,250 out of 18,56,63,617 outstanding shares, representing 81.30% participation. The table below summarises the outcome for each resolution.
| Resolution | Type | Total votes polled | Votes in favour | Votes against | % in favour | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Adoption of standalone financial statements | Ordinary | 15,09,49,250 | 15,09,49,140 | 110 | 99.9999% | Passed |
| 2. Adoption of consolidated financial statements | Ordinary | 15,09,49,250 | 15,09,49,140 | 100 | 100.00% | Passed |
| 3. Re-appointment of Arpit Vikram Jain | Ordinary | 15,09,49,250 | 15,07,50,496 | 1,98,754 | 99.87% | Passed |
| 4. Ratification of cost auditor remuneration for FY27 | Ordinary | 15,09,49,250 | 15,09,49,090 | 160 | 100.00% | Passed |
| 5. Introduction of Arkade ESOP 2026 | Special | 15,09,49,250 | 14,97,61,401 | 11,87,849 | 99.21% | Passed |
| 6. Extension of ESOP 2026 to subsidiary employees/directors | Special | 15,09,49,250 | 14,97,61,301 | 11,87,949 | 99.21% | Passed |
Category-wise participation
The promoter and promoter group, holding 13,21,79,848 shares, polled 12,91,99,848 votes, representing 97.74% of their holdings, and voted entirely in favour across all resolutions. Public institutional holders, with 14,03,195 shares, polled 11,94,933 votes (85.16% participation). Public non-institutional holders, holding 5,20,80,574 shares, polled 2,05,54,469 votes (39.47% participation). No invalid votes were recorded in any category for any resolution.
Notably, for the re-appointment of Arpit Vikram Jain (Resolution 3), public institutional holders voted 1,98,644 shares against out of 11,94,933 polled, representing 16.62% of their votes. For the two ESOP-related special resolutions (Items 5 and 6), public institutional holders voted 11,87,689 shares against, representing 99.39% of their institutional votes polled, while the promoter group and public non-institutional holders voted overwhelmingly in favour, resulting in both resolutions passing.
Governance and attendance
Mr. Amit Mangilal Jain, Chairman and Managing Director, chaired the meeting. Key personnel present included Whole-time Directors Mr. Arpit Vikram Jain and Mr. Sandeep Ummedmal Jain, along with Independent Directors Mrs. Neha Sunil Huddar, Mr. Abhishek Dev, and Mr. Sumesh Ashok Mishra. The statutory auditors, M/s Mittal & Associates, Chartered Accountants, were represented at the meeting. E-voting results were declared by the scrutinizer, M/s AVS & Associates, and filed with the stock exchange platforms on September 24, 2026.
What the numbers show
The clean audit record for FY26, with no qualifications in either the statutory or secretarial audit reports, reflects strong compliance. The ESOP 2026 resolutions passed despite near-unanimous opposition from public institutional holders, carried by the promoter group's 97.74% participation rate and broad support from non-institutional shareholders. The re-appointment of Arpit Vikram Jain also passed comfortably, with 99.87% of total votes polled in favour, notwithstanding 16.62% opposition from institutional holders.
Historical Stock Returns for Arkade Developers
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.38% | +0.76% | +1.84% | +0.53% | -31.05% | -28.52% |
How will the dilution from the newly approved Arkade ESOP 2026 impact the company's earnings per share in upcoming quarters?
What specific retention or performance metrics are tied to the ESOP grants extended to subsidiary directors and employees?
Does the near-unanimous opposition by institutional holders to the ESOP scheme signal potential future governance conflicts or reduced institutional confidence?


































