Australia sues Amazon over unfair Prime Video ad terms
The ACCC has filed a lawsuit against Amazon Australia, alleging it used unfair contract terms to force over one million annual Prime members to accept ads on Prime Video or pay a surcharge. The regulator claims Amazon denied refunds for unused portions of annual subscriptions cancelled due to the ad rollout in July 2024. Amazon stated it is reviewing the case and has cooperated with the investigation.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Australia's competition regulator has sued Amazon.com Inc., alleging the e-commerce giant used unfair subscription terms to force more than one million annual Prime members to either watch advertisements on Prime Video or pay extra to remove them. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) claims Amazon relied on unfair contract terms between November 2023 and August 2025 to alter the conditions of its Prime Video service, impacting consumers who had already paid for annual memberships.
Allegations of Unfair Contract Terms
The ACCC alleges that Amazon introduced advertisements on Prime Video in July 2024. Following this change, annual Prime subscribers were required to either accept the ads or pay an additional AU$2.99 per month for an ad-free experience. The regulator contends that customers who chose to cancel their annual Prime memberships due to this change were not entitled to refunds for the unused portion of their subscriptions.
| Metric | Detail |
|---|---|
| Investigation Period | November 2023 to August 2025 |
| Ad Introduction Date | July 2024 |
| Additional Cost for Ad-Free | AU$2.99 per month |
Regulatory Action and Response
Proceedings have been filed in the Federal Court. The ACCC is seeking penalties, consumer redress, legal costs, declarations that the contract terms were unfair, and additional court orders to address the alleged conduct. ACCC Chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb stated that Amazon Australia included multiple unfair terms in its contracts with Australian annual Prime subscribers and relied on these terms to implement ads on Prime Video. The investigation began after receiving consumer complaints regarding the ad rollout.
In response, an Amazon spokesperson stated that the company is reviewing the case filed by the ACCC in detail. Amazon emphasized that it has cooperated with the ACCC throughout its investigation and remains focused on providing the best experience for its Australian customers.
How might a ruling against Amazon influence the subscription pricing models of other global streaming services operating in Australia?
What legal precedents could this case set regarding the enforceability of unilateral contract changes for digital service providers?
Could this regulatory action prompt Amazon to alter its ad-introduction strategy in other international markets?






























