Aadhar Housing Finance Q1FY27 profit rises 19% to ₹282 crore on AUM growth
Aadhar Housing Finance delivered strong Q1FY27 results with net profit rising 19% to ₹282 crore on 18% AUM growth. Asset quality remained stable with GNPA at 1.31%, and management emphasized its urban-emerging strategy to sustain spreads above 5.5%.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Aadhar Housing Finance reported a 19% year-on-year increase in standalone net profit to ₹282 crore for Q1FY27, driven by an 18% expansion in Assets Under Management (AUM) to ₹31,364 crore. The housing finance company’s performance was supported by resilient demand in Tier II and Tier III markets, stable asset quality with Gross NPA at 1.31%, and efficient cost management. During the earnings call held on July 31, 2026, management reaffirmed its medium-term guidance of 20% AUM and profit growth for FY27, highlighting disciplined execution and a shift to cheque-realization-based disbursement recognition to enhance transparency.
The Board of Directors approved the unaudited standalone and consolidated financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026, on July 31, 2026, in compliance with SEBI LODR Regulations 30, 33, 51, 52, and 54. Joint Statutory Auditors S. R. Batliboi & Associates LLP and Kirtane & Pandit LLP submitted limited review reports confirming that the statements present fairly the financial position in accordance with Ind AS 34 and Listing Regulations.
Q1FY27 Financial Performance
Profit after tax (PAT) grew to ₹282 crore from ₹237 crore in Q1FY26. Return on assets (ROA) remained stable at 4.0%, while Return on equity (ROE) improved by 6 basis points to 14.7%. Net worth increased by 19% to ₹7,853 crore as of June 30, 2026. CFO Rajesh Viswanathan noted that the exit cost of funds stood at 7.7% versus 8% a year before, while portfolio yield exit was 13.5%, resulting in an exit spread of 5.8%.
| Metric: | Q1FY27 | Q1FY26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Profit (PAT): | ₹282 crore | ₹237 crore | +19% |
| Assets Under Management: | ₹31,364 crore | ₹26,524 crore | +18% |
| Net Worth: | ₹7,853 crore | ₹6,616 crore | +19% |
| Gross NPA (%): | 1.31% | 1.34% | -3 bps |
Disbursement reporting methodology changed from cheque handover to cheque realization basis starting Q1FY27. On the new basis, disbursements stood at ₹2,036 crore compared to ₹1,979 crore in the prior year period. Under the previous cheque handover method, disbursements would have registered a 19% YoY growth to ₹2,359 crore. MD Rishi Anand stated that Q2 disbursements are expected to be upward of 23-25% as the carry-forward business clears.
Operational Expansion and Technology
Aadhar Housing Finance maintained stable asset quality, with Gross NPA improving by 3 basis points to 1.31% as of June 30, 2026. Stage 2 NPAs improved by 40 basis points YoY to 3.3%. The total number of loan accounts exceeded 340,000. The company’s ‘Urban and Emerging’ branch model continued to drive market penetration, expanding its network to 628 branches across 22 states and covering over 550 districts. Management highlighted that emerging locations provide yields of 14-14.8%, compared to 11.5-12% in urban areas, helping sustain overall spreads above the 5.5% target.
The implementation of PMAY-U 2.0 is expected to further accelerate credit demand in Economically Weaker Section (EWS) and Low Income Group (LIG) segments. Additionally, the company enhanced its AI and digital capabilities across key business processes to improve operational efficiency, credit assessment, and customer experience, aligning its AI framework with the RBI's draft Model Risk Management guidance. Balance transfer out rates remained low at 5%, an improvement of 20 basis points YoY, supported by data-driven retention efforts.
Strategic Initiatives and Disclosures
During the quarter, the company assigned 4,088 non-default loan accounts worth ₹3,974.20 crore to another NBFC as part of its risk distribution strategy. These loans had a weighted average maturity of 151 months, with a retention of beneficial economic interest at 10%. Additionally, Aadhar Housing Finance raised ₹250 crore through private placement of Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs) on June 18, 2026, with full utilization confirmed for stated objects. Secured NCDs are backed by pari passu first charge on book debts and specific immovable properties.
Management addressed liquidity concerns, noting that liquidity stood at ₹2,371 crore, representing approximately 10% of total borrowings of ₹20,000 crore, though the typical buffer is maintained at 7-8%. Regarding capital adequacy, Tier 1 stood at 42.9% and Tier 2 at 0.5%. CFO Viswanathan stated there are no current plans to return capital to shareholders, as the high capital buffer supports growth plans and mitigates operational risks per ICAAP methodology.
What the Numbers Show
The simultaneous growth in AUM (18%) and PAT (19%) indicates effective scale economies and disciplined underwriting. The improvement in ROE despite a leveraged balance sheet suggests that the cost of equity capital is being efficiently deployed into higher-yielding assets. Furthermore, the stabilization of GNPA at 1.31% amidst rapid loan book expansion reflects robust credit assessment processes, particularly in the vulnerable EWS/LIG segments. The shift in disbursement reporting to a realization basis provides a more conservative view of cash flows, enhancing transparency for investors. Management’s confidence in maintaining spreads above 5.5% despite competitive pressures is underpinned by the strategic tilt towards higher-yielding emerging markets.
Historical Stock Returns for Aadhar Housing Finance
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.95% | +1.67% | -2.81% | +5.71% | -5.44% | 0.0% |
How might the implementation of PMAY-U 2.0 impact Aadhar Housing Finance's credit risk profile in the EWS and LIG segments over the next fiscal year?
What are the potential implications of the shift to cheque-realization-based disbursement recognition on the company's reported growth metrics compared to industry peers using traditional methods?
Could the strategic assignment of ₹3,974 crore in non-default loans signal a broader trend in risk distribution for housing finance companies, and how will this affect future capital adequacy?


































