SEPC Limited Reports Credit Rating Downgrades from CRISIL and Infomerics
SEPC Limited faced significant credit rating downgrades from both CRISIL and Infomerics rating agencies, with all facilities moved to 'D' category indicating default risk. The downgrades were triggered by delayed interest payments of ₹6 crore and court-ordered attachment of ₹154 crore receivables, despite improved financial performance showing ₹40 crore net profit in nine months of FY26.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
SEPC Limited has disclosed significant credit rating downgrades from two prominent rating agencies, marking a substantial deterioration in its credit profile. The company informed stock exchanges on March 10, 2026, about the downgrades received from CRISIL Ratings Limited and Infomerics Valuation and Rating Ltd.
Credit Rating Downgrades
The rating actions represent a sharp decline in the company's creditworthiness across both long-term and short-term facilities. Both agencies have moved the ratings to the 'D' category, which typically indicates default or expected default on financial obligations.
| Rating Agency: | Facility Type | New Rating | Previous Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRISIL: | Long Term Bank Facilities | Crisil D | Crisil BB+/Negative |
| CRISIL: | Short Term Bank Facilities | Crisil D | Crisil A4+ |
| Infomerics: | Long Term Bank Facilities | IVR D | IVR BB+/Negative |
| Infomerics: | Short Term Bank Facilities | IVR D | IVR A4+ |
CRISIL Rating Rationale
CRISIL Ratings downgraded SEPC's bank facilities totaling ₹890.15 crore due to delayed interest payment obligations. The company failed to service approximately ₹6 crore of term loan interest due on February 28, 2026. Additionally, there have been delays exceeding 30 days in clearing letter of credit dues and overdrawals in cash credit accounts.
| Total Bank Facilities Rated: | ₹890.15 crore |
|---|---|
| Long Term Rating: | Crisil D (Downgraded from Crisil BB+/Negative) |
| Short Term Rating: | Crisil D (Downgraded from Crisil A4+) |
The rating agency noted that the Madras High Court ordered attachment of ₹154 crore of SEPC's receivables on February 19, 2026, in connection with ongoing legal proceedings involving Twarit Consultancy Services Pvt Ltd and GPE entities. This led to lenders freezing the trust and retention account, exacerbating liquidity mismatches.
Infomerics Rating Action
Infomerics Valuation and Rating Ltd downgraded facilities worth ₹882.50 crore across various categories. The rating committee reviewed and downgraded both long-term and short-term bank facilities to IVR D from their previous ratings.
| Facility Category: | Amount (₹ crore) | Current Rating | Previous Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long Term Bank Facilities: | 85.56 | IVR D | IVR BB+/Negative |
| Long Term Proposed: | 2.65 | IVR D | IVR BB+/Negative |
| Short Term Bank Facilities: | 723.35 | IVR D | IVR A4+ |
| Short Term Proposed: | 70.94 | IVR D | IVR A4+ |
Financial Performance Context
Despite operational challenges, SEPC reported improved financial performance in recent months. For the first nine months of fiscal 2026, the company achieved net profit of ₹40 crore on operating income of ₹781 crore, compared to ₹15 crore profit on ₹485 crore revenue in the corresponding previous period.
| Financial Metric: | Nine Months FY26 | Nine Months FY25 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Income: | ₹781 crore | ₹485 crore |
| Net Profit: | ₹40 crore | ₹15 crore |
| PAT Margin: | 5.10% | 4.04% |
Regulatory Compliance
The disclosure was made pursuant to Regulation 30 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Company Secretary and Compliance Officer T Sriraman signed the communication digitally on March 17, 2026, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements for material information disclosure to both NSE and BSE.
Historical Stock Returns for SEPC
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -6.00% | -5.81% | -34.94% | -59.60% | -64.00% | +35.38% |
Will SEPC pursue debt restructuring negotiations with lenders to avoid potential bankruptcy proceedings?
How might the ongoing legal dispute with Twarit Consultancy Services and GPE entities impact SEPC's asset recovery timeline?
Could SEPC's improved operational performance attract strategic investors or acquisition interest despite the credit downgrades?

































