Delhi High Court Upholds ITC's 'BUKHARA' Trademark, Restrains Hotel from Usage
The Delhi High Court has issued an interim injunction prohibiting Bukhara Inn (Hotel Bukhara) from using the 'BUKHARA' trademark, which belongs to ITC Limited. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora ruled in favor of ITC, citing trademark infringement. The court dismissed the defendant's claim that the name was derived from the proprietor's surname 'Bukhari'. ITC's Bukhara restaurant, established in the late 1970s, has held the trademark since 1985. The ruling reinforces trademark protection for well-established brands in India's hospitality sector.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
In a significant ruling for intellectual property rights in India's hospitality sector, the Delhi High Court has prohibited Bukhara Inn (Hotel Bukhara) from using the trademark 'BUKHARA', which belongs to ITC Limited . This decision underscores the importance of trademark protection and the legal weight given to well-established brands in the country.
Key Points of the Ruling
- Interim Injunction Granted: Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora issued an interim injunction in favor of ITC Limited and ITC Hotels.
- Trademark Infringement Claim: The case was filed by ITC, alleging trademark infringement related to their renowned Bukhara restaurant at ITC Maurya in New Delhi.
- Established Brand: ITC's Bukhara restaurant, established in the late 1970s, has been a significant revenue generator.
- Trademark Status: The 'BUKHARA' trademark has been registered since 1985.
Court's Observations
The court made several key observations in its ruling:
- Dishonest Usage: The hotel's use of the name appeared dishonest and misleading to the court.
- Rejected Defense: The defendant's claim that the name derived from the proprietor's surname 'Bukhari' was dismissed.
- Prior Knowledge: The judge noted that the adoption of the name seemed to be made with full awareness of ITC's prior, well-known trademark status.
Implications of the Ruling
This decision by the Delhi High Court has significant implications for trademark protection in India:
- It reinforces the legal protection afforded to well-established trademarks.
- The ruling serves as a deterrent to potential trademark infringers in the hospitality and other sectors.
- It highlights the importance for businesses to conduct thorough trademark searches before adopting brand names.
Next Steps
The court has restrained the defendant from using or imitating the 'BUKHARA' mark or any deceptively similar name. The case is scheduled to resume on April 14, 2026, where further proceedings may provide additional clarity on the extent of trademark protection and potential damages.
This ruling underscores the need for businesses to be vigilant about their intellectual property rights and the potential consequences of infringing on established trademarks. As the case progresses, it may set important precedents for trademark law in India's evolving hospitality and culinary landscape.
Historical Stock Returns for ITC
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.26% | +0.38% | -1.23% | -6.49% | -7.76% | +129.70% |
















































