The Civil Aviation Ministry is currently analyzing the comprehensive report submitted by the probe panel that investigated Interglobe Aviation 's massive flight disruptions earlier this month. Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu confirmed on December 30 that the ministry is reviewing the findings and seeking additional input from aviation regulators.

Investigation Details and Timeline

The inquiry committee, headed by DGCA Joint Director General Sanjay K Bramhane, was constituted on December 5 to conduct a thorough assessment of the circumstances that led to the unprecedented flight disruptions. The committee submitted its report on Friday evening after completing its comprehensive review.

Speaking to reporters, Minister Naidu stated, "The report has been submitted to the ministry. We are analysing the report, taking further comments from the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), and we will follow up on the action on that."

Scale of Flight Disruptions

The disruptions were unprecedented in scale, with IndiGo cancelling more than 1,600 flights in a single day, followed by several consecutive days of bulk cancellations. The inadequate planning in implementing revised pilot rest norms was identified as the primary reason for the operational chaos.

Regulatory Response and Actions

Following the massive disruptions, DGCA took immediate regulatory action against the country's largest airline. The aviation regulator directed IndiGo to reduce its winter schedule by 10% and issued show-cause notices to key executives including CEO Pieter Elbers and COO Isidre Porqueras.

The DGCA order dated December 5, which established the probe panel, indicated that the situation revealed deficiencies in multiple operational areas. According to the regulator, the circumstances demonstrated shortcomings in:

• Internal oversight mechanisms
• Operational preparedness protocols
• Compliance planning procedures

Background and Regulatory Oversight

The DGCA order establishing the investigation panel noted that the regulator had previously issued repeated directions and advance instructions to the airline regarding timely preparation for implementing Flight Duty Time Limitations (FDTL) norms. The situation was deemed serious enough to warrant an independent examination of the airline's operational practices.

The ministry's analysis of the probe panel report will determine the next course of action and any additional measures required to prevent similar disruptions in the future. The comprehensive review aims to address the systemic issues that led to the operational breakdown and ensure improved compliance with aviation safety and operational standards.

InterGlobe Aviation Limited has received a penalty order of ₹14,59,527 from tax authorities in Lucknow, which the company disclosed under regulatory requirements on December 30, 2025. The penalty relates to input tax credit claims for the financial year 2021-22.

Penalty Details and Authority

The order was issued by the Office of the Joint Commissioner, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, with the company receiving communication on December 29, 2025. The penalty amount covers denied input tax credit claims along with associated interest charges.

Nature of Tax Dispute

The tax department has denied input tax credit that InterGlobe Aviation had availed and subsequently raised demand along with interest and penalty charges. This action represents a disagreement between the company and tax authorities regarding the legitimacy of certain tax credit claims made during FY 2021-22.

The company has provided details of the violation as alleged by the authorities, though it maintains that its position on the input tax credit claims was appropriate and legally sound.

Company's Response Strategy

InterGlobe Aviation has expressed confidence in its position regarding the disputed tax credits. The company believes the order passed by the authorities contains errors and that it has a strong case on merits. This assessment is supported by advice from external tax advisors who have reviewed the matter.

The airline plans to contest the penalty order before the appropriate appellate authority, indicating its intention to pursue all available legal remedies to challenge the decision.

Financial Impact Assessment

According to the company's disclosure, the penalty order will not have significant impact on its financial position, operations, or other business activities. This suggests that while the penalty amount is substantial, it falls within manageable limits for the airline's overall financial health.

The disclosure was made under Regulation 30 of SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations, 2015, ensuring transparency with investors and stakeholders regarding material developments affecting the company.