Iranian President Pezeshkian has publicly reaffirmed his commitment to the country's armed forces, declaring that defending them is his duty and that he will back them with all his strength. The statement, reported by Fars News, comes amid broader discussions surrounding government decisions related to oil provisions and institutional accountability.

Dismissal of Oil Provision Criticism

Pezeshkian addressed criticism directed at the government over the provision of 20 mln barrels of oil to a company, characterizing the controversy as a matter of internal disclosure rather than a subject warranting public scrutiny. His remarks signal a firm stance on the handling of the issue within official channels.

The key positions stated by Pezeshkian, as reported by Fars News, are outlined below:

Strong Stance on Future Oil Supply Decisions

In a notably assertive statement, Pezeshkian vowed that should a similar situation arise in the future, he would not hesitate to supply 100 mln barrels under comparable circumstances. This position underscores his administration's readiness to make large-scale resource allocation decisions when deemed necessary, and reflects his broader posture of institutional support and decisiveness on matters of national interest.

The remarks, attributed to Fars News, reflect the administration's position on both military allegiance and resource management policy.

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has hardened its stance over the Strait of Hormuz, placing the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between the United States and Iran under severe strain. President Donald Trump warned that the Islamic Republic faces destruction if it continues violating the ceasefire agreement, as US forces resumed strikes on Iranian military targets following an IRGC-directed drone attack on a commercial tanker in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran's widening aggression — now extending to Gulf states including Bahrain — has deepened the Hormuz crisis and threatens to collapse the MoU signed by Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, which was aimed at securing a permanent peace deal and ensuring safe passage through the vital waterway. Adding further weight to the standoff, Iran's Unified Command of the Armed Forces has now declared that any US interference in the Strait of Hormuz will be met with a "swift and decisive response," according to Fars News.

Trump Issues Existential Warning

"There may come a point when we are no longer able to be reasonable, and will be forced to militarily complete the job," Trump posted. "If that happens, the Islamic Republic of Iran will no longer exist!" Vice President JD Vance, who served as Trump's chief negotiator, echoed the stance: "Iran signed a ceasefire agreement. We have honored it. But violence will be met with violence."

Strikes Resume After Tanker Hit

US Central Command (CENTCOM) said its forces carried out new strikes on Iranian military targets, including surveillance, communications, air defense, drone storage, and mine-laying facilities. The action followed an Iranian drone strike on a Panama-flagged tanker in the Strait of Hormuz. CENTCOM stated the strikes were a "direct response to continued Iranian aggression against commercial shipping" and noted that Iran was given a chance to honor the ceasefire but elected not to.

The IRGC said it targeted US military positions in response, while Iran's foreign ministry described its actions as "defensive." Bahrain, which hosts the US Navy's Fifth Fleet headquarters, also reported an Iranian drone strike on its territory, marking a significant escalation as the conflict's regional footprint widened to Gulf states beyond the immediate Hormuz flashpoint.

Hormuz Security Elevated

The Joint Maritime Information Center raised the Hormuz security threat level to "substantial." The Strait remains a critical flashpoint, with incidents including an unidentified projectile striking a tanker and damaging its bridge. Iran has asserted that safe transit cannot be guaranteed under ambiguous arrangements, pushing for recognition of its control over the waterway.

The following table summarizes the key incidents and developments driving the current escalation: