Qalibaf says Iran must rely on strength to safeguard security
Iran's top negotiator Qalibaf stated the nation must be prepared to fight to safeguard national security while using diplomacy. He described the conflict with America as existential and emphasized reliance on domestic strength, noting Iran will not adhere to any Memorandum of Understanding if it does not benefit.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Iran's top negotiator, Qalibaf, stated that the nation has never welcomed war but must always be prepared to fight and stand until the end to safeguard its national security and interests. He emphasized the necessity of using diplomacy and negotiation tools to realize and secure these interests. The remarks highlight a dual approach of maintaining defensive readiness while pursuing diplomatic avenues. Qalibaf added that the country's armed forces have complete freedom of action as always to confront the 'enemy's aggression'. He asserted that national security lies in maintaining the 'Iranian arrangements' on the Strait of Hormuz.
Existential War with America
Qalibaf described the current situation as an essential and existential war with America. He asserted that the aim of this conflict extends beyond toppling Iran's system to fragmenting the country. This characterization underscores the high stakes perceived by the Iranian leadership regarding the ongoing geopolitical tensions. He further clarified that negotiation at this stage is not equivalent to compromise, but, along with war, is part of the strategy of resistance and protection of national interests.
Strategic Autonomy and Long-Term Approach
Qalibaf emphasized that Iran's approach in war or negotiation must be based on national interests and security, realistic, and long-term. He stated that the nation has no choice but to rely on its own strength and become strong. Regarding international agreements, he declared that if Iran is not going to benefit from a Memorandum of Understanding, there is no reason to adhere to such an understanding.
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Official | Qalibaf |
| Role | Iran's Top Negotiator |
| Stance on War | Never welcomed war, but must be ready to fight |
| Strategic Tools | Diplomacy and negotiation |
| Nature of Conflict | Essential and existential war with America |
| Armed Forces | Complete freedom of action to confront aggression |
| Strategic Location | Iranian arrangements on Strait of Hormuz |
| Core Strategy | Rely on own strength and become strong |
| MOU Stance | No reason to adhere if Iran does not benefit |
How might the 'complete freedom of action' granted to armed forces impact the stability of the Strait of Hormuz?
What specific diplomatic measures is Iran likely to pursue alongside its military readiness?
How will Iran's stance on international agreements affect its future negotiations with global powers?






















