Ex-Intel CEO warns Taiwan blackout could spark global crisis

1 min read     Updated on 17 Jul 2026, 06:46 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shraddha JScanX News Team
AI Summary

Former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger warned that a Taiwan energy blackout could cause a global economic crisis worse than the Great Depression, noting fabs take 90 days to restart. Intel shares surged over 320% in the past year, supported by a U.S. government stake and a $5 billion investment from Nvidia Corp. The company is now producing commercial chips using ASML’s next-generation lithography systems.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
45839768

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Former Intel Corporation CEO Pat Gelsinger warned that a complete energy cutoff in Taiwan could trigger an economic crisis worse than the Great Depression. In an interview with the “All-In Podcast” cohost Jason Calacanis, Gelsinger highlighted that turning off a fabrication plant prevents operations from resuming for 90 days. He emphasized that the economic impact of a Taiwan brownout would surpass the Great Depression globally.

Gelsinger’s comments follow a period where Intel’s stock faced pressure due to stronger-than-expected capital spending plans from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. However, Intel has staged a strong comeback over the past year. The turnaround was fueled by President Donald Trump’s decision for the U.S. government to acquire a roughly 10% stake in the chipmaker and Nvidia Corp.’s purchase of more than $5 billion in Intel shares, granting it an approximately 4% stake.

Intel’s Strategic Shift

Intel shares have surged over 320% in the past year, driven by these investments and broader U.S. efforts to strengthen domestic chip manufacturing. This growth comes amid concerns over the geopolitical risks associated with Taiwan-based TSMC. The company recently achieved a key milestone with its ASML chipmaking machine. ASML Holding N.V. CEO Christophe Fouquet confirmed that Intel is already producing commercial chips using next-generation High-NA EUV lithography systems.

Leadership and Financial Strategy

Gelsinger attributed Intel’s previous decline to non-technical leadership, stating he was the first technical leader associated with the company in 15 years upon his return in 2021. He criticized predecessors for making significant technical decisions based on spreadsheets rather than technology trends. He also expressed concern over Intel’s financial strategy before his tenure, noting the company returned approximately $79 billion to shareholders through stock buybacks and dividends from 2015 to 2020.

Key Financial Metrics

Metric Value
Intel 1-year stock surge Over 320%
Nvidia stake in Intel Approximately 4%
Nvidia investment More than $5 billion
U.S. government stake Roughly 10%
Shareholder returns (2015-2020) Approximately $79 billion

How might Intel's rapid stock surge and government backing influence its competitive positioning against TSMC in the global semiconductor market?

What specific contingency plans are being developed by the U.S. government and chipmakers to mitigate the economic risks of a potential Taiwan energy crisis?

Could Nvidia's significant investment in Intel signal a shift in industry partnerships or potential consolidation in the chipmaking sector?

like17
dislike

Taiwan Freedom Project launches special section in The Washington Times

1 min read     Updated on 04 Jul 2026, 03:52 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
AI Summary

The Taiwan Freedom Project has released a 32-page special section in The Washington Times to advocate for Taiwan's sovereignty and counter CCP narratives. The publication features analyses from US lawmakers, Taiwanese officials, and policy experts. It is the first in a series of educational resources that will also be translated into Mandarin.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
44662915

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

The Taiwan Freedom Project has published a 32-page special section in The Washington Times titled "Why Taiwan Matters, Now More Than Ever." The publication serves as an educational resource intended to help citizen leaders find their voice in defense of freedom against totalitarianism. The project aims to seize the intellectual and moral high ground in the battle of narratives against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Tom McDevitt, chairman of The Washington Times, stated that the organization believes Taiwan is the most important geopolitical question facing America and the free world. He encouraged readers to engage with the content to preserve the freedom, peace, sovereignty, and prosperity of Taiwan. Ian Everhart, managing editor of the Taiwan special section, noted that this edition is the first in a series and will be translated into Mandarin.

The special section is organized into three parts, featuring contributions from a bipartisan group of lawmakers and experts. The inaugural section includes the "Ten More for Taiwan" report by House Select Committee on China Chairman Rep. John Moolenaar and Ranking Member Rep. Ro Khanna. This report provides a roadmap for strengthening US relations with Taiwan and deterring aggression by the CCP.

Key voices from Taiwan featured in the publication include President Lai Ching-te, Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim, and Deputy Minister of Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council Shen Yu-chung. Their contributions address topics such as responding to China’s expansionism, gray zone warfare, and countering legal and psychological warfare. Other contributors include Iris Shaw, director of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Mission in the United States, and Rear Admiral (Ret.) U.S. Navy Mark Montgomery.

The publication also includes a section led by Rep. Christopher H. Smith, co-chair of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC), which calls for support for the Transnational Repression Policy Act. The final section, "What is to be Done?," offers practical solutions for achieving victory, with contributions from experts such as John Dotson of the Global Taiwan Institute and Bill Gertz, national security correspondent for The Washington Times.

How will the translation of this publication into Mandarin influence public opinion within Taiwan and among Chinese-speaking communities globally?

What specific legislative actions are expected to follow the 'Ten More for Taiwan' report introduced by Rep. Moolenaar and Rep. Khanna?

How might the CCP respond to this narrative campaign, and what forms of counter-propaganda or diplomatic pressure could be anticipated?

like18
dislike
Must Read Next

Earnings

Corporate Actions

Stocks