ESET reports on Gamaredon's 2025 cyberespionage tactics

2 min read     Updated on 25 Jun 2026, 08:29 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shriram SScanX News Team
AI Summary

ESET Research's report on Gamaredon's 2025 activities reveals a focused campaign against Ukrainian entities, marked by the introduction of six new PowerShell tools and alliances with other Russia-aligned groups like Turla. The group increasingly leveraged legitimate cloud storage services such as Wasabi and Tebi for data exfiltration and used dead-drop services to obscure its C&C infrastructure.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
43945177

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

ESET Research released a report on June 25, 2026, detailing the 2025 operations of the Russia-aligned Gamaredon threat group, which exclusively targeted Ukrainian governmental and military institutions. The group focused on exfiltrating sensitive information to support Russian interests in the ongoing war. Gamaredon's activities remained closely aligned with Russia's geopolitical objectives, aiming to gain an intelligence advantage through cyberespionage.

Throughout 2025, Gamaredon operators developed and deployed six new malicious PowerShell tools: PteroDee, PteroCache, PteroDum, PteroOdd, PteroPaste, and PteroEffigy. PteroPaste stood out for its complexity, combining a downloader, a USB weaponizer, and a runner component for persistence. The group also resurrected an old VBScript weaponizer, PteroSetup, which first appeared in 2021.

Gamaredon collaborated with Turla, another Russia-aligned threat actor, in early 2025, underscoring potential coordination among cyberespionage groups. ESET researcher Zoltán Rusnák noted that Gamaredon took a short operational break in January 2025 but remained highly active afterward, with updates often timed around major Russian and Crimean holidays. The group is attributed by the Security Service of Ukraine to the 18th Center of Information Security of Russia’s FSB.

The group shifted its tactics in the second half of 2025, launching larger and more frequent spear phishing campaigns. Beyond phishing, Gamaredon used custom weaponizers for lateral movement, targeting USB drives, mapped network drives, and software installers to spread within or across organizations.

Gamaredon increasingly relied on legitimate third-party services to hide its command and control (C&C) infrastructure and stolen data. The group abused messaging, social media, and blogging services like Telegram, Dropbox, DEV Community, and Mastodon as dead drops for resolving C&C servers and distributing payloads. Additionally, C&C servers were hidden behind tunnels, workers, dynamic DNS (DDNS), and platform as a service (PaaS) solutions.

On the data-exfiltration front, Gamaredon upgraded its file stealers, PteroPSDoor and PteroVDoor, to support S3-compatible cloud storage services like Wasabi, Tebi, and Intercolo. This shift reduced the need for the group to maintain its own infrastructure and helped malicious traffic blend in with legitimate storage providers. PteroBox continued to upload files to Dropbox.

New Tools Introduced by Gamaredon in 2025

Tool Name Type Functionality
PteroDee PowerShell Malicious tool
PteroCache PowerShell Malicious tool
PteroDum PowerShell Malicious tool
PteroOdd PowerShell Malicious tool
PteroPaste PowerShell Downloader, USB weaponizer, runner
PteroEffigy PowerShell Malicious tool
PteroSetup VBScript Weaponizer (resurrected from 2021)

Cloud Storage Services Used for Exfiltration

Service Provider Type
Wasabi S3-compatible cloud storage
Tebi S3-compatible cloud storage
Intercolo S3-compatible cloud storage
Dropbox Cloud storage

Will the collaboration between Gamaredon and Turla in early 2025 signal a permanent consolidation of Russian cyberespionage capabilities?

How might the increased reliance on legitimate cloud storage services for data exfiltration impact the security policies of cloud providers?

Could the resurrection of older tools like PteroSetup indicate a strategic shift towards evading modern detection methods?

like16
dislike

Trump Calls Zelenskyy-Putin Meeting Ideal, Urges Compromises to End War

1 min read     Updated on 05 Jun 2026, 01:42 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BScanX News Team
AI Summary

Trump has described a potential meeting between Ukrainian President Zelenskyy and Russian President Putin as ideal, stating that both sides must make certain compromises to end the ongoing war. The remarks mark an escalation from his earlier stance of simply welcoming such a meeting, though no specific conditions, venue, or timeline were provided.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
42149183

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Trump has stated that a meeting between Ukrainian President Zelenskyy and Russian President Putin would be ideal, adding that both sides must make certain compromises to bring an end to the ongoing Ukraine-Russia war. The remarks represent a stronger diplomatic signal compared to his earlier position of simply welcoming such a meeting.

Trump's Statement on Zelenskyy-Putin Talks

Trump's updated remarks go beyond expressing openness to direct dialogue, now explicitly framing a Zelenskyy-Putin meeting as ideal and calling on both parties to engage in compromise. The statement underscores a position that favors negotiated resolution to the conflict, though no specific conditions, venue, or timeline for such a meeting were outlined in the available information.

Key Details

Parameter: Details
Statement By: Trump
Nature of Statement: Zelenskyy-Putin meeting described as ideal; both sides must compromise
Parties Referenced: Zelenskyy (Ukraine), Putin (Russia)
Context: Ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict

The development is being closely watched by international observers given the significance of any potential direct engagement between the Ukrainian and Russian leaders. No additional context regarding the circumstances or format of a prospective meeting was available in the source data.

How might the Kremlin and Kyiv react to Trump's explicit call for compromises?

Could this shift in rhetoric influence the US stance on future military aid to Ukraine?

What specific concessions might be considered acceptable to both parties to initiate talks?

like20
dislike