Group criticizes pipeline deal as costly for Alberta
Let Alberta Decide has criticized the pipeline announcement linked to the Canada-British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement, arguing that conditions like the Pathways carbon capture project and the North Coast tanker ban make Alberta less competitive. The group warns of increased costs for taxpayers and questions the economic viability of the project under current federal policies.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The Canada-British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement, signed on July 2, 2026, by Prime Minister Mark Carney and Premier David Eby, aims to accelerate energy and trade corridors. However, advocacy group Let Alberta Decide argues the associated pipeline announcement is not a victory for the province. The group contends that the deal imposes conditions that make Alberta less competitive and leaves taxpayers with significant financial burdens.
Pipeline Conditions and Costs
Keith Wilson, K.C., co-lead of Let Alberta Decide, stated that while Albertans support pipelines, they do not support them at any cost. He criticized the agreement for linking the new pipeline to the Pathways carbon capture project and maintaining the North Coast tanker ban. The group also highlighted that British Columbia is seeking to force Alberta to pay toll charges to ship through the province. Wilson argued that these factors, combined with federal carbon policies, increase the marginal cost of production and make Alberta less competitive.
Economic and Competitive Concerns
Let Alberta Decide pointed to a Fraser Institute report by economist Jack Mintz, which found that carbon policies increase costs for oil, gas, and power production. Wilson noted that a pipeline does not create new barrels and that companies invest only when production is competitive. He warned that if Ottawa's Net Zero framework makes Alberta energy less competitive, the announcement becomes merely a political talking point rather than an economic solution.
Impact on Families
Tanya Clemens, co-lead of Let Alberta Decide, expressed concern over the financial implications for Alberta families. She questioned who would pay for higher production costs, power costs, carbon capture subsidies, and B.C. compensation. Clemens argued that these factors, along with federal borrowing, make life less affordable and push the financial burden onto future generations.
| Project | Investment / Value | Key Concern |
|---|---|---|
| New West Coast Oil Pipeline | $35 billion - $44 billion | High cost to taxpayers |
| Pathways Carbon Capture | Dependent on pipeline | Increases production costs |
| North Coast Tanker Ban | Remains in place | Limits market access |
| B.C. Toll Charges | Proposed | Reduces competitiveness |
How will the proposed toll charges impact the long-term competitiveness of Alberta oil compared to other global producers?
What legal avenues are available to Alberta to challenge the constitutionality of the interprovincial tolls and federal conditions?
Could the financial burden of carbon capture subsidies deter private investment in the new pipeline project?

























