Scaramucci favors Bitcoin over gold as hedge against US debt
Anthony Scaramucci agrees with Peter Schiff on US debt concerns but favors Bitcoin over gold. While gold outperformed Bitcoin over five years (+149% vs +38%), Scaramucci cites digital scarcity as a superior long-term inflation hedge amidst $39.89 trillion national debt.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
SkyBridge Capital founder Anthony Scaramucci endorsed Peter Schiff’s analysis of soaring U.S. debt and inflation on Tuesday but recommended Bitcoin rather than gold as the primary hedge. Scaramucci acknowledged the macroeconomic risks highlighted by Schiff, including elevated deficits and interest burdens, yet argued that digital assets offer a more effective solution in the evolving monetary system. This divergence highlights a growing split among macro strategists regarding the best store of value amid fiscal expansion.
Divergent Views on Fiscal Risk
Scaramucci addressed Schiff’s blog post on America’s fiscal outlook, noting that while Schiff’s annualized government borrowing figures are overstated, the underlying reality remains severe. Scaramucci estimated the real financing need at $2.5 trillion, describing it as "enormous outside a recession." He clarified that roughly $300 billion of the reported $800 billion borrowed in three months went directly into the Treasury’s cash account.
The national debt has reached $39.89 trillion, with the deficit swelling to $1.366 trillion. The U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio has climbed from about 31% in 1980 to roughly 120% today. Scaramucci agreed with Schiff that there is "no way out of this situation except through inflation" and that the Federal Reserve will likely continue monetary easing.
Asset Preference: Bitcoin vs. Gold
Despite agreeing on the problem, Scaramucci rejected Schiff’s conclusion that gold is the only solution. "He just needs the answer to be gold," Scaramucci said. "I read the same charts and reach a different asset. Buy Bitcoin." He views Bitcoin as a scarce asset and part of the answer to inflationary pressures, contrasting with Schiff’s characterization of Bitcoin as a "highly speculative collectible digital token."
Performance data shows gold has outperformed Bitcoin over both one-year and five-year periods. However, gold has shown limited strength in 2026 amid geopolitical tensions including the Iran conflict.
| Asset | YTD Gains +/- | 1-Year Gains +/- | 5-Year Gains +/- |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bitcoin | -28.21% | -48% | +38% |
| Spot Gold | -0.394989% | +31% | +149% |
At the time of writing, Bitcoin traded at $63,679.67, down 0.48% over the last 24 hours.
What the Numbers Show
The performance divergence underscores the risk premium associated with Bitcoin. While gold delivered +149% gains over five years compared to Bitcoin’s +38%, Bitcoin’s year-to-date decline of -28.21% versus gold’s near-flat -0.394989% suggests heightened volatility. Scaramucci’s thesis relies on long-term scarcity value rather than short-term price action, betting that Bitcoin’s structural supply constraints will eventually outweigh its current underperformance relative to traditional safe havens.
How might institutional investors adjust their safe-haven allocations if the Federal Reserve maintains monetary easing to manage the $2.5 trillion financing need?
Could Bitcoin's current YTD underperformance against gold signal a temporary liquidity crunch or a fundamental shift in investor sentiment toward digital assets?
What specific macroeconomic indicators would likely trigger a reversal in the Bitcoin vs. Gold performance divergence observed in 2026?

































