Zelio E-Mobility faces ₹6.72 crore customs demand over e-scooter classification
Zelio E-Mobility Limited faces a ₹6.72 crore customs duty demand for alleged misclassification of e-scooter imports. The company, which received the notice in late July 2026, is preparing a response within 30 days while seeking legal advice to challenge the classification interpretation.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Zelio E-Mobility Limited faces a potential liability of approximately ₹6.72 crore after receiving a Demand cum Show Cause Notice from the Principal Commissioner of Customs, ICD PPG & Other ICDs, Delhi. The notice, issued on July 29, 2026, alleges that the company misclassified certain imported goods, specifically e-scooters imported in Completely Knocked Down (CKD) condition during FY22 and FY23. The authority questions the company’s availment of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) concessions based on this classification error. This development introduces immediate regulatory scrutiny and potential financial outflows for the electric vehicle manufacturer as it navigates compliance with customs regulations.
The disclosure was made to the Bombay Stock Exchange on August 03, 2026, pursuant to Regulation 30 read with Para A of Part A of Schedule III of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. Zelio E-Mobility stated that the notice was emailed on July 30, 2026, but was inadvertently routed to the company’s spam folder, delaying its review until August 03, 2026. The company subsequently issued a revised intimation to explicitly include the specific quantum of the proposed differential customs duty, which was omitted in the initial filing.
The notice, numbered 29/PC/2026-27 (File No. GEN/ADT/PCA/111/2026-ICD-BBG-CUS-COMMRTE-PPG-DELHI), invokes Section 28(4) read with Section 99A of the Customs Act, 1962. It proposes the recovery of a differential customs duty of approximately ₹6.72 crore (₹6,72,42,832), excluding applicable interest under Section 28AA and a penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. Additionally, the authority has called upon the company to explain why the imported goods should not be held liable for confiscation under Section 111(m) of the same act.
| Particulars | Details |
|---|---|
| Notice Number | 29/PC/2026-27 |
| Issuing Authority | Principal Commissioner of Customs, ICD PPG & Other ICDs, Delhi |
| Date of Issue | July 29, 2026 |
| Date of Receipt | July 30, 2026 |
| Allegation | Misclassification of imported CKD e-scooters in FY22-FY23 |
| Proposed Duty Demand | ₹6.72 crore (excluding interest and penalty) |
| Response Deadline | Within 30 days of receipt |
| Financial Impact | Pending adjudication; no immediate operational impact expected |
The company is required to file its reply within 30 days of receiving the notice. In its submission, Zelio E-Mobility noted that while the financial impact cannot be fully quantified until adjudication is complete, management does not expect any immediate impact on operations. The firm believes the imports were undertaken based on a bona fide understanding of applicable customs classification. It is seeking appropriate legal advice and is in the process of formulating its response to submit before the competent authority within the stipulated period.
Regulatory Context
The disclosure aligns with SEBI Master Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/PoD2/CIR/P/0155 dated November 11, 2024, which mandates timely reporting of such communications. The delay in disclosure was attributed to an internal IT routing error rather than intentional withholding. Managing Director Kunal Arya signed the intimation, affirming that the company is taking all necessary measures to protect its interests and will pursue the matter diligently in accordance with applicable legal provisions.
Historical Stock Returns for Zelio E-Mobility
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2.00% | +12.59% | +11.94% | +230.65% | +432.38% | +432.38% |
How might Zelio E-Mobility's legal strategy regarding the 'bona fide' classification defense influence the final adjudication and potential penalty severity?
What impact could a successful customs demand of ₹6.72 crore, plus interest and penalties, have on Zelio's short-term cash flow and upcoming capital expenditure plans?
Will this regulatory scrutiny trigger a broader audit or increased vigilance from customs authorities on other Indian EV manufacturers importing CKD kits?


































