WS Industries Board Approves Binding Tripartite Term Sheet for Senior Living Project in Chennai
W.S. Industries (India) Limited's Board of Directors, at its meeting on 27th July, 2026, approved a Binding Tripartite Term Sheet for a senior living/senior care residential project at Poonamalee, Outer Ring Road (ORR), Chennai, Tamil Nadu. The project is to be developed on approximately 4.00 acres of land, in phases, with an indicative FSI/FAR of 3.25 and an indicative permissible built-up area of approximately 5,66,280 sq. ft., subject to statutory approvals. The company will act as Developer, entitled to a Fixed Return of 7.5% of the Topline actually realised, while M/s. Bharathi & Associates Asset Building Private Limited, as Marketing Co-Developer, is entitled to a Fixed Fee of 15% of the Topline. The company will also be responsible for arranging Working Capital facilities for the project, proposed to be secured against the project land owned by M/s. SIXP Realty Private Limited.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The Board of Directors of W.S. Industries (India) Limited , at its meeting held on 27th July, 2026, approved the company's entry into a Binding Tripartite Term Sheet for the development of a senior living/senior care residential project at Poonamalee, Outer Ring Road (ORR), Chennai, Tamil Nadu. The term sheet involves three parties: W.S. Industries (India) Limited as the Developer, M/s. SIXP Realty Private Limited as the Landowner, and M/s. Bharathi & Associates Asset Building Private Limited as the Marketing Co-Developer. The term sheet is legally binding and enforceable upon all parties in accordance with its terms, and is set to be executed on or after 27th July, 2026.
Project Overview
The proposed senior living/senior care residential project is to be developed in phases on approximately 4.00 acres of land located at Poonamalee, ORR, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. The key project parameters are outlined below:
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| Land Area: | Approximately 4.00 acres |
| Development Mode: | In phases |
| Indicative FSI / FAR: | 3.25 |
| Indicative Permissible Built-up Area: | Approximately 5,66,280 sq. ft. |
| Project Location: | Poonamalee, Outer Ring Road (ORR), Chennai, Tamil Nadu |
| Date of Execution: | On or after 27.07.2026 |
All project parameters are subject to applicable statutory approvals.
Roles and Responsibilities of the Parties
Each party to the Binding Tripartite Term Sheet has been assigned distinct roles and responsibilities for the development and execution of the project:
- W.S. Industries (India) Limited (Developer): Responsible for end-to-end development and execution of the project, in phases, and for applying for, raising, and arranging the Working Capital facilities required for the project.
- M/s. SIXP Realty Private Limited (Landowner): Shall provide the project land for development and make it available as security/collateral for the Working Capital facilities, subject to the terms stipulated by the concerned lender(s) and execution of requisite financing and security documents.
- M/s. Bharathi & Associates Asset Building Private Limited (Marketing Co-Developer): Shall undertake branding, marketing, and sales activities, along with such other responsibilities as may be agreed between the parties.
Commercial Arrangement
The consideration structure under the Binding Tripartite Term Sheet has been defined for both the Developer and the Marketing Co-Developer:
| Party: | Entitlement |
|---|---|
| Developer (W.S. Industries (India) Limited): | Fixed Return equivalent to 7.5% of the Topline actually realised from the project |
| Marketing Co-Developer (M/s. Bharathi & Associates Asset Building Private Limited): | Fixed Fee equivalent to 15% of the Topline, inclusive of sales and marketing expenditure |
The company has confirmed that this transaction does not fall within related party transactions.
Working Capital and Security Arrangement
The Board also approved the company's proposal to apply for, raise, and arrange Working Capital facilities required for the development and execution of the project. The proposed Working Capital facilities are intended to be secured, inter alia, against the project land owned by the Landowner. Where required by the concerned lender(s), additional security may be offered by way of hypothecation, assignment, charge, or other appropriate security interest over current assets and other assets of the project, including receivables, inventory, stocks, book debts, and other movable and/or current assets, whether existing or created/acquired in connection with such Working Capital facilities. These facilities are proposed to be availed subject to sanction by the concerned lender(s) and applicable approvals.
Next Steps and Definitive Agreement
The Binding Tripartite Term Sheet contemplates the subsequent execution of a detailed Tripartite Joint Venture/Development Agreement or other definitive agreement between the parties, setting out the detailed rights, obligations, and responsibilities of each party, subject to satisfaction of applicable conditions precedent. The company has clarified that it has not undertaken any obligation towards the Landowner's Assured Return or any shortfall thereunder. Any guarantee, indemnity, or other security obligation, if applicable, shall be specifically set out in the definitive agreement and related financing documents, subject to applicable approvals. The Board meeting commenced at 17.35 Hrs and concluded at 17.45 Hrs on 27th July, 2026.
Historical Stock Returns for WS Industries
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +3.35% | +4.29% | -2.83% | -15.79% | -26.31% | +1,140.19% |
How will the shift into the senior living sector impact W.S. Industries' overall revenue diversification and long-term growth strategy?
What are the potential risks associated with securing working capital against the landowner's collateral, and how might lender requirements affect project timelines?
Given the 7.5% fixed return on topline revenue, how does this deal structure compare to typical profit-sharing models in the Indian real estate joint venture market?


































