UN report links Boeing aircraft to Sudan RSF weapons transport
UN experts allege Boeing 727s linked to US contractor Steven Shaulis transported RSF weapons and mercenaries via Chad in November 2024. The aircraft operated without authorization, with lawyers citing lack of movement as an evasion tactic. Shaulis' firm, CADG, has earned $419 million in US contracts. Boeing faces ongoing scrutiny amid its $244 billion in government contracts and political controversies surrounding Air Force One deliveries.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
United Nations experts reported that Boeing 727 aircraft linked to US government contractor Steven Shaulis were used to transport weapons, drones, and mercenaries for Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The aircraft appeared in Chad during November 2024, operating from the military apron of N'Djamena's airport without authorization from local aviation authorities. This finding highlights potential compliance gaps in the oversight of US-linked defense contractors operating in conflict zones.
The report, cited by Reuters, identified two aircraft acquired by Shaulis-owned Contractor Airways, based in South Africa, from Kalitta Charters II, a Michigan-based cargo operator, and one aircraft from Brazil. Lawyers for Kalitta noted that the planes did not log movement after arriving in Chad, a tactic potentially used to avoid detection. The UN report stated that the RSF utilized the N'Djamena-Nyala air corridor to move fighters, foreign mercenaries, and military equipment into Darfur.
Shaulis, a former US military veteran, serves as an executive director and co-founder of Singapore-based CADG. According to a Reuters report from July 15, CADG has earned over $419 million from US taxpayers through government contracts. Shaulis was also linked to a Boeing 737 aircraft destroyed last year that reportedly carried RSF personnel. Boeing Co. and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding these allegations.
Context of Sudan Conflict
Sudan has been under civil war since 2023, with clashes between the internationally recognized government and the RSF for control of the country. UN experts have accused the RSF of committing genocide in the Darfur region. The use of unauthorized air corridors by the RSF underscores the complexity of monitoring military supply lines in the region.
Boeing's Government Contracts
Boeing's defense arm is currently manufacturing the updated Air Force One fleet for the US government. CEO Steve Parker confirmed delivery by 2028 but warned investors of higher costs. The company previously secured contracts totaling $244 billion in 2025. Political scrutiny remains high, particularly after President Donald Trump flew in a $400 million Qatar-gifted Boeing 747, drawing criticism from Democratic lawmakers including Gov. Gavin Newsom.
Key Entities and Figures
| Entity | Role / Connection | Financial Figure |
|---|---|---|
| Steven Shaulis | US Contractor, CADG Executive | $419 million (CADG revenue) |
| Contractor Airways | Owner of implicated aircraft | N/A |
| Kalitta Charters II | Previous owner of two aircraft | N/A |
| Boeing Co. | Aircraft manufacturer | $244 billion (2025 contracts) |
What the Numbers Show
The scale of CADG's earnings ($419 million) relative to the specific allegations against Shaulis suggests a significant volume of government business that may require enhanced compliance scrutiny. The lack of logged movements for the aircraft in Chad indicates deliberate evasion tactics, raising questions about the effectiveness of current monitoring mechanisms for contractor-operated assets in active conflict zones.
How might the US Department of Defense revise its compliance auditing protocols for defense contractors operating in active conflict zones following these allegations?
Could the association with unauthorized arms transport impact Boeing's ability to secure or maintain its $244 billion in government contracts scheduled for 2025?
What legal liabilities might Steven Shaulis and CADG face under US arms export regulations if the UN findings are substantiated in court?

































