True Green Bio Energy FY26 Results: Net profit turns positive at ₹313.3 crore
- Net profit turned positive at ₹313.3 crore in FY26, reversing a prior-year loss
- Revenue surged over 11-fold to ₹2,837 crore following ethanol plant commissioning
- Board recommends no dividend; profits to be retained for future growth
- Total assets expanded to ₹5,577 crore with significant increase in borrowings

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
True Green Bio Energy Limited reported a full-year net profit of ₹313.3 crore for FY26, marking a significant turnaround from a net loss of ₹21.9 crore in the previous fiscal year. The company's revenue from operations surged to ₹2,837 crore, up from ₹233 crore in FY25, driven by the commencement of commercial operations at its new ethanol plant.
The board has not recommended a dividend for the financial year, opting instead to plough back profits for future growth and development. The company also held its 22nd Annual General Meeting on September 29, 2026, where shareholders approved related party transactions and the appointment of new independent directors.
Financial Performance
The company's financial results reflect the impact of its transition into ethanol manufacturing. Revenue from operations jumped significantly as the grain-based ethanol plant began dispatching sizable volumes to major oil marketing companies.
| Metric | FY26 | FY25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from Operations | ₹2,837 crore | ₹233 crore | +1121% |
| Net Profit After Tax | ₹313.3 crore | (₹21.9 crore) | Turnaround |
| Total Income | ₹2,840 crore | ₹234.2 crore | +1114% |
Operating expenditure stood at ₹2,358 crore, while depreciation expenses rose to ₹62.4 crore from ₹15.4 crore in the prior year. Finance costs increased substantially to ₹128 crore, reflecting higher borrowing levels to fund the new business line.
What the Numbers Show
The turnaround in profitability is directly linked to the operational ramp-up of the ethanol facility. Revenue grew more than tenfold, while operating expenses scaled proportionately but less sharply, leading to an expansion in profit before tax to ₹420 crore from a loss of ₹12.2 crore. This divergence indicates that the new plant is generating substantial operating leverage relative to its cost base.
Balance Sheet and Capital Structure
Total assets expanded to ₹5,577 crore from ₹3,123 crore in FY25, primarily due to capitalization of property, plant, and equipment. Non-current borrowings rose to ₹2,273 crore, while current borrowings increased to ₹1,131 crore. The debt-equity ratio improved slightly to 2.14 from 1.50, though total debt nearly doubled to support the capital-intensive ethanol operations.
Cash and cash equivalents increased to ₹190.9 crore from ₹28 crore, providing a stronger liquidity buffer. Trade receivables surged to ₹736.6 crore, reflecting the scale-up in sales volume to oil marketing companies under long-term supply agreements.
Corporate Developments
During the year, the company allotted 30.4 lakh equity shares upon conversion of warrants, increasing paid-up capital to ₹329.6 crore. The board composition saw changes with the resignation of Whole Time Director Rajan Srivastava and the appointment of Pradeep Mantri. Ms. Trusha Shah was appointed as an independent director for a five-year term.
The company also constituted a Corporate Social Responsibility Committee and adopted a new CSR policy effective August 13, 2026, as it now meets the threshold criteria for mandatory CSR spending.
Historical Stock Returns for True Green Bio Energy
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.62% | -6.35% | +21.81% | +82.01% | +276.04% | 0.0% |
How will the significant increase in trade receivables to ₹736.6 crore impact the company's working capital management and cash conversion cycle in the near term?
Given the debt-equity ratio rise to 2.14 and total debt nearly doubling, what is the company's strategy for deleveraging as the ethanol plant reaches full capacity?
Will the decision to forgo dividends in favor of reinvestment signal a long-term capital allocation strategy, or is it primarily driven by the need to service increased finance costs?


































